Social Justice and Individual Ethics*
作者:
PHILIPPE VAN PARIJS,
期刊:
Ratio Juris
(WILEY Available online 1995)
卷期:
Volume 8,
issue 1
页码: 40-63
ISSN:0952-1917
年代: 1995
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1995.tb00196.x
出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
Abstract.If one is committed to a “Rawlsian” conception of justice, is one not also necessarily committed to a “Christian” personal ethics? MOE explicitly, if one believes that social justice requires the maximinning of material conditions, should one not use one's time and resources as well as one can in order to assist the poorest? The paper offers a very partial answer to these questions by arguing for the following two claims: (1) Contrary to what is implied by some egalitarian critics of Rawls, the idea of a well‐ordered society does not require maximin‐guided choices at the individual level, and hence leaves room for legitimate incentive payments.(2) Despite Rawls's own neglect of this fact, a limited form of patriotism does constitute an individual “natural duty” following from a commitment to maximin
点击下载:
PDF
(1627KB)
返 回