AbstractThe oxidative folding of small, cysteine‐rich peptides to selectively achieve the native disulfide bond connectivities is critical for discovery and structure‐function studies of many bioactive peptides. As the propensity to acquire the native conformation greatly depends on the peptide sequence, numerous empirical oxidation methods are employed. The context‐dependent optimization of these methods has thus far precluded a generalized oxidative folding protocol, in particular for peptides containing more than two disulfides. Herein, we compare the efficacy of optimized solution‐phase and polymer‐supported oxidation methods using three disulfide‐bridged conotoxins, namely µ‐SIIIA, µ‐KIIIA and ω‐GVIA. The use of diselenide bridges as proxies for disulfide bridges is also evaluated. We propose the ClearOx‐assisted oxidation of selenopeptides as a fairly generalized oxidative folding protocol. Copyright © 2010 European Peptide Society a