首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Comparison of hot cathode and cold cathode ionization gauges
Comparison of hot cathode and cold cathode ionization gauges

 

作者: R. N. Peacock,   N. T. Peacock,   D. S. Hauschulz,  

 

期刊: Journal of Vacuum Science&Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films  (AIP Available online 1991)
卷期: Volume 9, issue 3  

页码: 1977-1985

 

ISSN:0734-2101

 

年代: 1991

 

DOI:10.1116/1.577439

 

出版商: American Vacuum Society

 

关键词: PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;IONIZATION GAGES;CATHODES;THERMIONIC EMISSION;SPACE CHARGE;TRAPPED ELECTRONS;ELECTRIC CURRENTS;ELECTRIC FIELDS;MAGNETIC FIELDS;SENSITIVITY;CONTAMINATION;DEGASSING;ULTRAHIGH VACUUM

 

数据来源: AIP

 

摘要:

Ionization gauges are commonly used for pressure measurement from the lowest achievable pressures to 10−2Torr. Two types exist: In the hot cathode gauge (HCG) the source of the ionizing electrons is a thermionic cathode. In the cold cathode gauge (CCG) it is a circulating space charge current of electrons trapped in crossed electric and magnetic fields. Indications of both types of gauge are gas dependent. Relative sensitivities for different gases are not the same for different HCGs or CCGs, or for HCGs compared to CCGs. Both types of gauge are susceptible to contamination. The filament heating power of the HCG is sufficient to cause local outgassing of adsorbed material, and possibly large pressure errors. Each has certain spurious effects. The lower limit of the HCG is set by x‐ray photocurrent and electron impact desorption. The CCG is subject to discontinuities in the current versus pressure characteristic. Starting of the discharge in a CCG may be delayed at ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). Pumping speeds of both types of gauge are of magnitude 10−2l/s, so that gauge pumping is usually negligible.

 

点击下载:  PDF (727KB)



返 回