首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Validity and Reliability of the Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale
Validity and Reliability of the Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale

 

作者: DORIS CHERNIK,   MYRON TUCKER,   BETH GIGLI,   KISOOK YOO,   KALA PAUL,   HARRIET LAINE,   JUDITH SIEGEL,  

 

期刊: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology  (OVID Available online 1992)
卷期: Volume 12, issue 1  

页码: 43-48

 

ISSN:0271-0749

 

年代: 1992

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

The Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (NAS) was developed to measure the full range of behavioral functioning from fully alert to deep coma. This investigator-rated scale was evaluated in 60 patients undergoing conscious sedation for maxillofacial procedures. The results obtained on the NAS were reliable, as evidenced by high correlations between the ratings of the two raters. The scale is also valid as determined by high correlations between the NAS and a standard scale, the Glasgow Coma Scale (criterion validity) and between the NAS and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (behavioral validity). The NAS clearly distinguished between two levels of sedation (heavy and light). Furthermore, the NAS appears to be better able to discriminate among the different degrees of sedation in lightly sedated patients than the Glasgow Coma Scale.

 

点击下载:  PDF (455KB)



返 回