首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Temperature measurement in critically ill orally intubated adults: A comparison o...
Temperature measurement in critically ill orally intubated adults: A comparison of pulmonary artery core, tympanic, and oral methods

 

作者: Karen Giuliano,   Susan Scott,   Sheila Elliot,   Anthony Giuliano,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 27, issue 10  

页码: 2188-2193

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: body temperature;tympanic membrane;thermometers;intensive care;intubation;endotracheal;pulmonary artery;monitoring;physiologic;technology;mouth floor;respiration;artificial

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Objective:Core temperature measurement using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter is considered the gold standard for measuring temperatures in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to compare oral and tympanic temperature measurements (in both the oral and core equivalence modes) against PA core temperature measurements to determine which method was the most accurate and reliable in the absence of a PA catheter.Design:Prospective, descriptive comparative analysis.Patients:Convenience sample of 102 critically ill orally intubated patients with a PA catheter in place.Setting:A 24-bed medical/surgical/trauma intensive care unit in a university-affiliated medical center.Interventions:Four experienced intensive care unit nurses were trained in the use of temperature measurement with the oral, tympanic (both core and oral equivalence modes were used), and PA core methods. Simultaneous temperature measurements were then taken once in each subject using each method. The potential covariates that were analyzed were mean blood pressure, patient acuity using the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, age, sex, ambient room temperature, and ventilator circuit temperature.Measurements and Main Results:The training period indicated that it took more time to train experienced nurses in the use of tympanic thermometry than oral thermometry. Descriptive statistics were the following: core, x = 37.33 (SD = 0.89); oral, x = 37.18 (SD = 0.92); tympanic oral, x = 36.80 (SD = 0.93); and tympanic core, x = 37.12 (SD = 1.0). Bias averages were calculated and were significantly different from 0 for all three methods (oral-PA core, −0.15 [SD = 0.36]; tympanic core-PA core, −0.11 [SD = 0.57], tympanic oral-PA core, −0.52 [SD = 0.53]), indicating that there is some degree of decreased accuracy associated with each method when compared with PA core. However, scatter plots using the Bland and Altman methodology (Altman DG, Bland JM: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, Chapman and Hall, 1991) illustrate that the greatest variability is associated with the tympanic method.Conclusions:Temperature measurement is an important piece of clinical data in a critically ill patient population. We found oral thermometry to be the most accurate and reproducible method when a PA core measurement was not available.

 



返 回