首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Comparative studies of IPPV and HFPPV with PEEP in critical care patients. IA cl...
Comparative studies of IPPV and HFPPV with PEEP in critical care patients. IA clinical evaluation

 

作者: L. WATTWIL,   ULF SJÖSTRAND,   ULF BORG,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1983)
卷期: Volume 11, issue 1  

页码: 30-37

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1983

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

The effects of the ventilatory patterns of a conventional ventilator (SV-900) and a low-compression ventilator (system H) were studied in 12 patients with respiratory failure (RF). Volume-controlled ventilation at frequencies (f) of 20 breath/min (SV-20) with SV-900, and 20 (H-20) and 60 (H-60 = high-frequency positive-pressure ventilation, HFPPV) breath/min with system H was given. Inspiration constituted 25% (with an inspiratory pause of 10%) of the ventilatory cycle with SV-900 and 22% with system H. Intratracheal (ITP), intrapleural, systemic and pulmonary arterial (PAP), and central venous (CVP) pressures were measured at normoventilation. During H-60, normoventilation was provided with smaller tidal volumes and lower mean intratracheal pressures than during SV-20 and H-20. Cardiac index and oxygen transport were not affected by changes in ventilatory pattern. The respiration-synchronous variations in CVP, PAP, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (WP) during ventilation at 20 breath/min were abolished during HFPPV. In the most severely ill patients, long-term HFPPV was uneventful. Airway suctioning during ventilation with oxygen was an important feature of the pneumatic valve principle (system H). The results of this study indicate that volume-controlled HFPPV is as efficient and as well accepted by the patient as conventional ventilation (SV-20).

 

点击下载:  PDF (575KB)



返 回