首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Chloroprocaine Antagonism of Epidural Opioid AnalgesiaA Receptor‐specific Phenom...
Chloroprocaine Antagonism of Epidural Opioid AnalgesiaA Receptor‐specific Phenomenon?

 

作者: William Camann,   Philip Hartigan,   Lesley Gilbertson,   Mark Johnson,   Sanjay Datta,  

 

期刊: Anesthesiology  (OVID Available online 1990)
卷期: Volume 73, issue 5  

页码: 860-863

 

ISSN:0003-3022

 

年代: 1990

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Anesthetic Techniques: epidural.;Anesthetic Agents: chloroprocaine, lidocaine.;Analgesia: postoperative; butorphanol, fentanyl.

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Sixty healthy patients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive either lidocaine or 2-chloroprocaine as the primary local anesthetic agent. When patients first complained of postoperative pain in the recovery room, they were given either fentanyl 50 μg or butorphanol 2 mg, epidurally, in a randomized, blinded fashion. Postoperative analgesia, quantitated on a visual analogue scale, as well as time elapsed until first request for supplemental opioid, did not differ for patients receiving butorphanol after either 2-chloroprocaine or lidocaine anesthesia. In contrast, epidural fentanyl produced a shorter and lesser degree of sensory analgesia after 2-chloroprocaine use, whereas epidural fentanyl after lidocaine anesthesia provided pain relief similar to that seen in the butorphanol groups. Side effects were limited to somnolence with butorphanol and pruritus with fentanyl. No evidence of respiratory depression was seen in any patient. We conclude that 2 mg of butorphanol epidurally provides approximately 2 to 3 h of effective analgesia after cesarean delivery with either lidocaine or 2-chloroprocaine anesthesia. Epidural fentanyl seems to be antagonized when 2-chloroprocaine, but not lidocaine, is used as the primary local anesthetic agent. We suggest a possible mu-receptor-specific etiology for this effect.

 

点击下载:  PDF (313KB)



返 回