首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Ornidazole versus Clindamycin: Comparative Evaluation in the Treatment of 140 Serious A...
Ornidazole versus Clindamycin: Comparative Evaluation in the Treatment of 140 Serious Anaerobic Infections

 

作者: H. Giamarellou,   M. Volanaki,   A. Avlami,   K. Tsatsiadís,   E. Petrochilos,   G.K. Daikos,  

 

期刊: Chemotherapy  (Karger Available online 1982)
卷期: Volume 28, issue 6  

页码: 502-511

 

ISSN:0009-3157

 

年代: 1982

 

DOI:10.1159/000238140

 

出版商: S. Karger AG

 

关键词: Ornidazole;Clindamycin;Comparison;Anaerobic infections

 

数据来源: Karger

 

摘要:

A randomised prospective clinico-laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of ornidazole versus clindamycin in anaerobic infections was performed in 140 patients; 67 were given ornidazole and 73 received clindamycin. Patients were mainly suffering from peritonitis, pelvic cellulitis, endometritis, soft tissue infections and abdominal abscesses, which were distributed rather equally in both groups. Ornidazole was administered at a dose of 500 mg every 12 h i.v. or/and orally, and clindamycin 600 mg every 8 h i.v. for 7–60 days. In pus cultures, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis were the main isolates. The coexistence of aerobes necessitated the addition of an aminoglycoside in 111 patients, while six times chloramphenicol had proved ineffective against anaerobes. Between the two groups no statistically significant difference was found in the excellent response rate, although the overall cure rate was superior in the ornidazole group (80.6 vs. 68.5%), with a prompt response within less than 48 h in the case of ornidazole. Side effects necessitating discontinuation of chemotherapy included severe nausea in 1 patient treated with ornidazole and diarrhea in 8 patients given clindamyci

 

点击下载:  PDF (2703KB)



返 回