首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Ambulatory 24‐h blood pressure assessment of the felodipine‐metoprolol co...
Ambulatory 24‐h blood pressure assessment of the felodipine‐metoprolol combination versus amlodipine in mild to moderate hypertension

 

作者: Faiez Zannad,   Jean-Marc Boivin,  

 

期刊: Journal of Hypertension  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 17, issue 7  

页码: 1023-1032

 

ISSN:0263-6352

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: hypertension;ambulatory blood pressure monitoring;antihypertensive therapy;combination therapy

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo measure the time effect profiles of a once daily administered combination tablet felodipine-metoprolol 5/50 mg (Logimax®, Astra) and amlodipine 5 mg (Norvasc®, Pfizer) on blood pressure and heart rate using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.DesignRandomized multicentre parallel-group study with a single-blind placebo run-in period of 4 weeks duration and a 6-week double-blind active treatment period.Patients and methodsOut of 245 randomized outpatients (90 men, 155 women) with uncomplicated mild-to-moderate primary hypertension and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95–115 mmHg inclusive, 212 (102 on felodipine-metoprolol, 110 on amlodipine) were eligible for analysis. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed at the end of the placebo run-in (baseline) and after 6 weeks active treatment (post-treatment).ResultsBoth felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine induced smooth and consistent reduction in DBP and systolic blood pressure throughout the 24-h period, hence not altering the diurnal rhythm. However, felodipine-metoprolol reduced all average blood pressures (24-h, day- and night-time) more than amlodipine (for 24-h average blood pressure 14:4/9:5 mmHg and 8:9/5:5 mmHg, respectively). Medians of individual diastolic trough-to-peak (T/P) ratios were similar for felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine (54 and 50%, respectively), while for the systolic T/P ratios, the corresponding values were 74 and 35%, repectively; no significant difference between treatments was seen. As distinguished from amlodipine, both heart rate and rate pressure product were markedly decreased on felodipine-metoprolol throughout the 24-h period and even during the early morning hours. In general, both treatments were well tolerated.ConclusionsBoth felodipine-metoprolol and amlodipine achieved optimal control of blood pressure during the inter-dosing interval in line with their pharmokinetic profiles. The vasodilatory adverse events were slightly more reported with felodipine-metoprolol combination, but due to more pronounced lowering of the average blood pressures and the potent additional effect on heart rate and rate pressure product, the efficacy/tolerability balance seems to be equal to or better than that obtained with monotherapy such as amlodipine.

 

点击下载:  PDF (237KB)



返 回