首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts
Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts

 

作者: William E. Cooper,   Stephen J. Eady,   Pamela R. Mueller,  

 

期刊: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America  (AIP Available online 1985)
卷期: Volume 77, issue 6  

页码: 2142-2156

 

ISSN:0001-4966

 

年代: 1985

 

DOI:10.1121/1.392372

 

出版商: Acoustical Society of America

 

数据来源: AIP

 

摘要:

A series of experiments was conducted to examine the influence of contrastive stress on intonational patterns of duration and fundamental voice frequency (F0). In a preliminary study, intonational patterns in spontaneous speech were compared with the patterns in oral reading of the transcribed spontaneous material. In both circumstances, a general declination ofF0peaks throughout the course of a sentence was not regularly observed, contrary to earlier findings with oral reading of isolated sentences. Two experiments were then conducted to examine the possibility that the general absence of declination observed here might be due to the influence of sentence focus, following previous results from Swedish showing that declination was not observed consistently in isolated sentences until after the site of focus. In experiment 1, we found no evidence of this restriction on declination in the oral reading of English declaratives. Declination was observed both before and after the focused item in a sentence. Furthermore, our analyses revealed that focus (as manifested by contrastive stress) is generally accompanied by an increase in duration on the focused word and by a sharp drop inF0following the focused item. In experiment 2, these effects were replicated and extended using longer sentences. In both experiments, the influence of focus was strictly localized to the site of focus in the case of duration, but notF0. The results for both duration andF0indicate that the influence of focus assignment on these attributes varies systematically as a function of the focus location in the sentence. Finally, the combined elongation effects for focus and utterance‐final lengthening were less than would be predicted by an additive model, suggesting the operation of an expandability constraint on segmental lengthening in speech production.

 

点击下载:  PDF (2333KB)



返 回