首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Coloanal anastomosisAre functional results better with a pouch?
Coloanal anastomosisAre functional results better with a pouch?

 

作者: H. Ortiz,   M. De Miguel,   P. Armendáriz,   J. Rodriguez,   C. Chocarro,  

 

期刊: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum  (OVID Available online 1995)
卷期: Volume 38, issue 4  

页码: 375-377

 

ISSN:0012-3706

 

年代: 1995

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Coloanal anastomosis;colonic reservoir

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

PURPOSE:Different studies have shown that low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis often yield poor functional results. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a colonic reservoir is able to improve functional results.METHODS:Thirty‐eight consecutive patients subjected to low anterior resection were randomized following rectal excision in two groups. One (n=19) had a stapled straight coloanal anastomosis, and the other (n=19) had a 10‐cm stapled colonic pouch low rectal anastomosis. Median anastomotic distance above the anal verge was 3.38±0.56 cm and 2.14±0.36 cm in both groups, respectively. Continence alterations, urgency, tenesmus, defecatory frequency, anal resting and maximum voluntary squeezing pressures, and maximum tolerable volume were evaluated one year later.RESULTS:One patient died of pulmonary embolism, and seven presented with a recurrence and were excluded from the study. Stool frequency was greater than three movements per day in 33.3 percent of cases with a reservoir and in 73.3 percent of those with a straight coloanal anastomosis(P<0.05). Maximum tolerable volume was significantly greater in patients with a reservoir (335 ± 195) than in those without (148 ± 38)(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in other variables studied.CONCLUSIONS:This study shows that some aspects of defecatory function after rectal excision could improve with a colonic reservoir.

 

点击下载:  PDF (295KB)



返 回