Penal Reform in the Netherlands: Part II—Criteria for Deciding on Alternatives to Imprisonment
作者:
L. Hulsman,
期刊:
The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
(WILEY Available online 1982)
卷期:
Volume 21,
issue 1‐3
页码: 35-47
ISSN:0265-5527
年代: 1982
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2311.1982.tb00443.x
出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
AbstractNew sanctions as an alternative to imprisonment should not be introduced before their capacity for reducing custodial sentences is compared with other methods of bringing about such a reduction.Any consideration of the possible introduction of an alternative sanction should always take into account its potential influence on the community's absorption of events which could lead to criminalisation. Changes in civil law can contribute to an increase in the possibilities of “civilisation” of conflicts on a community level and thus to a reduction of the number of events processed by the criminal justice system. Other important matters to take into account in assessing alternatives to imprisonment are their possible influence on: (i) the “policy‐assessing” role of the criminal law judge; (ii) the influence on the (un) controllability of the penal system; and (iii) the effects on public perception of events which can lead to crimin
点击下载:
PDF
(1552KB)
返 回