首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Effect of conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation on airway pressure in...
Effect of conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation on airway pressure in dogs and plastic models with tracheal stenosis

 

作者: Masahiro MD Shinozaki,   Akio MD Sueyoshi,   Toshihiko MD Morinaga,   Hideaki MD Tsuda,   Takesuke MD Muteki,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 24, issue 4  

页码: 658-662

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1996

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of jet ventilation on tracheal stenosis in dogs and plastic models.DesignProspective, randomized trial in dogs, and multitrial tests in tracheal stenosis models.SettingAnimal laboratory in a university setting.InterventionsTracheal stenosis was surgically created around the middle of the trachea. Conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation were compared at the same value of PaCO2in dogs and at the same tidal volume in tracheal stenosis models.SubjectsTwelve mongrel dogs and four types of plastic models with combinations of short or long stenosis and fluid or nonfluid stenosis.Measurements and Main ResultsCanine Studies. Mean peak airway pressure values at the distal and proximal portion of the stenosis, and the end-expiratory pressure at the distal portion of the stenosis, were significantly higher during conventional mechanical ventilation than during jet ventilation. The mean values of arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and cardiac output did not change significantly between conventional mechanical ventilation and jet ventilation, except for the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure value.Plastic Mold Studies. Peak airway pressure and end-expiratory airway pressure at the poststenotic trachea during jet ventilation with the model lung were significantly lower than during conventional mechanical ventilation. The difference in peak airway pressure and end-expiratory airway pressure values between jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation increased more in short stenosis and nonfluid stenosis.ConclusionsThe jet flow that struck the portion of the stenosed wall reversed direction, even during early expiration. Therefore, the expiration during jet ventilation was facilitated more by the reversed flow than by the expiration during conventional mechanical ventilation. This reversed flow may provide lower end-expiratory airway pressure at the poststenotic portion with jet ventilation than with conventional mechanical ventilation.We conclude that jet ventilation was a useful method of ventilation in cases with tracheal stenosis, especially nonfluid and short stenosis.(Crit Care Med 1996; 24:658-662)

 



返 回