THE CORPORATE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AS ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE: A CRITIQUE
作者:
Mark Considine,
期刊:
Australian Journal of Public Administration
(WILEY Available online 1988)
卷期:
Volume 47,
issue 1
页码: 4-18
ISSN:0313-6647
年代: 1988
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1988.tb01042.x
出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
Abstract:A corporate management framework has been the basis for a transformation of Australian public administration in recent years. Program budgeting, corporate planning, performance contracts, program evaluation and new forms of efficiency scrutiny are among the techniques introduced. They stem from a dominant paradigm of technical and instrumental rationality, within which a framework of practical remedies and technologies of power carries the corporate management label. Four concepts underly this framework and its techniques: the product format, instrumentalism, integration and purposive action. The framework has fundamental problems. The product format is inappropriate for many public services and overvalues quantifiable, single‐purpose outputs while denigrating claims of worth and effectiveness made on non‐economic grounds; instrumentalism ignores the political dimensions of public organisations; integration denies the value of decentralised forms of service development and delivery and, paradoxically, contradicts current private management precepts; and purposive action displays an unwarranted optimism about the potency of technical rationality under central direction. The four principles must be reviewed as offering few prospects for genuine and lasting ref
点击下载:
PDF
(1268KB)
返 回