Three experiments were conducted to study the effect of segmental and suprasegmental corrections on the intelligibility and judged quality of deaf speech. By means of digital signal processing techniques, including LPC analysis, transformations of separate speech sounds, temporal structure, and intonation were carried out on 30 Dutch sentences spoken by ten deaf children. The transformed sentences were tested for intelligibility and acceptability by presenting them to inexperienced listeners. In experiment 1, LPC based reflection coefficients describing segmental characteristics of deaf speakers were replaced by those of hearing speakers. A complete segmental correction caused a dramatic increase in intelligibility from 24% to 72%, which, for a major part, was due to correction of vowels. Experiment 2 revealed that correction of temporal structure and intonation caused only a small improvement from 24% to about 34%. Combination of segmental and suprasegmental corrections yielded almost perfectly understandable sentences, due to a more than additive effect of the two corrections. Quality judgments, collected in experiment 3, were in close agreement with the intelligibility measures. The results show that, in order for these speakers to become more intelligible, improving their articulation is more important than improving their production of temporal structure and intonation.