Photoperiodic insects are able to distinguish between long days and short days. In various models the long day response is classifically considered the “actively” induced state. The short day response is thought to be “passive”, caused by failure of light to coincide with a photosensitive part of the night or failure of coincidence of constituent oscillators. The photoperiodic response curve ofPieris brassicaeshowed that diapause is induced by short days (4–14 h), and non‐diapause state by several conditions (natural and non‐natural): long days (16 h or more), LL, DD and ultrashort days (0.1 h). By reciprocal transfers of larvae between non‐diapausing determining and diapause determining conditions, it was proved possible to estimate the differential capacity of four non‐diapausing conditions vs. the diapausing action of LD 8: 16 in decreasing sequence: LD 16:8 > LL > DD = LD 0.1: 23.9. DD may be considered a “neutral” condition. In darkness the development seems to be determined by an endogenous program without external influence. LL, although beingan aperiodic signal as DD, has a weak antidiapausingeffect.Thebiological clock ofPierisdifferentiates between two constant conditions. The four non‐diapausing conditions have the same effect on the development when applied during the entire larval life, but have different effects when only applied during a few days. Both ecological conditions LD 16:8 and LD 8:16 have an action on the development but in an opposite way. There was not a “passive” state caused by failure of another inductive photoperiod. Ultra‐short days, DD and LL are without ecological meaning. Nevertheless, in these experiments, they provided informations in attempts to determine the mechanism of the time measurement. The external coincidence model of Pittendrigh and Minis (1964) was the more adequate to explain theearlier results on the biological clock ofPieris.However, this model has to be modified to account for the differential significance of several non‐diapausing conditions.