Ion Bernstein wave heating (IBWH) utilizes the ion Bernstein wave (IBW), a hot plasma wave, to carry the radio frequency (rf) power to heat the tokamak reactor core. Earlier wave accessibility studies have shown that this finite‐Larmor‐radius (FLR) mode should penetrate into a hot dense reactor plasma core without significant attenuation. Moreover, the IBW’s low perpendicular phase velocity (&ohgr;/k⊥≊VTi≪V&agr;) greatly reduces the otherwise serious wave absorption by the 3.5 MeV fusion &agr; particles. In addition, the property of IBW’s thatk⊥&rgr;i≊1 makes localized bulk ion heating possible at the ion cyclotron harmonic layers. Such bulk ion heating can prove useful in optimizing fusion reactivity.In another vein, with proper selection of parameters, IBW’s can be made subject to strong localized electron Landau damping near the major ion cyclotron harmonic resonance layers. This property can be useful, for example, for rf current drive in the reactor plasma core. IBW’s can be excited with loop antennas or with a lower‐hybrid‐like waveguide launcher at the plasma edge, the latter structure being one that is especially compatible with reactor application. In either case, the mode at the plasma edge is an electron plasma wave (EPW). Deeper in the plasma, the EPW is mode transformed into an IBW. Such launching and mode transformation of IBW’s were first demonstrated in experiments in the Advanced Concepts Torus‐1 (ACT‐1) [Phys. Rev. Lett.45, 1105 (1980)] plasma torus and in particle simulation calculations. These and other aspects of IBW heating physics have been investigated through a number of experiments performed on ACT‐1, the Japanese Institute of Plasma Physics Tokamak II‐Upgrade (JIPPTII‐U) [Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 2339 (1985)], the Tokyo University Non‐Circular Tokamak (TNT) [Nucl. Fusion26, 1097 (1986)], the Princeton Large Tokamak (PLT) [Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 294 (1988)], and Alcator‐C [Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 298 (1988)]. In these experiments both linear and nonlinear heating processes have been observed. Interestingly, improvement of plasma confinement was also observed in the PLT and Alcator‐C experiments, opening up the possible use of IBW’s for the active control of plasma transport.Two theoretical explanations have been proposed: one based on four‐wave mixing of IBW with low‐frequency turbulence, the other on the nonlinear generation of a velocity‐shear layer. Both models are consistent with the observed threshold power level of a few hundred kW in the experiments. Experiments on lower field plasmas on JFTII‐M [EighthTopicalConferenceonRadio‐FrequencyPowerinPlasmas, Irvine, CA, 1989 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989), p. 350] and DIII‐D [EighthTopicalConferenceonRadio‐FrequencyPowerinPlasmas, Irvine, CA, 1989 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989), p. 314] have raised some concern with the IBW wave‐launching process. The experiments showed serious impurity release from the walls but little or no core heating, a combination of circumstances strongly suggestive of edge heating. Possible parasitic channels could include the excitation of short wavelength modes by the Faraday shield’s fringing fields, antenna‐sheath‐wave excitation, an axial‐convective loss channel, and nonlinear processes such as parametric instability and ponderomotive effects.Suggested remedies include changes in the antenna phasing, the use of low‐Zinsulators, operating at higher frequencies, positioning the plasma differently with respect to the antenna, eliminating the Faraday shields, and using a waveguide launcher. The recent JIPPTII‐U experiment, employing a 0‐&pgr; phased antenna array with a higher frequency 130 MHz source, demonstrated that those remedies can indeed work. Looking to the future, one seeks additional ways in which IBWH can improve tokamak performance. The strong ponderomotive potential of the IBWH antenna may be used to stabilize external kinks and, acting as an rf limiter, to control the plasma edge. Control of the plasma pressure profile with local IBWH heating is already an important part of the Princeton Beta Experiment‐Modified (PBX‐M) [NinthTopicalConferenceonRadio‐FrequencyPowerinPlasmas, Charleston, SC, 1991 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1991), p. 129] program in its exploration of the second‐stability regime. Application of IBWH may also improve the performance of neutral beam heating and the efficiency and localization of lower‐hybrid current drive for current profile control. Used with pellet injection, IBWH may also prolong the period of good confinement.The three planned high‐power IBWH experiments covering vastly different parameters:f=40–80 MHz for PBX‐M;f=130 MHz for JIPPT‐II‐U; andf=430 MHz for the Frascati Tokamak‐Upgrade (FT‐U) [16thEuropeanPhysicalSocietyConferenceonControlledFusionandPlasmaPhysics, Venice, Italy, 1989 (European Physical Society, Amsterdam, 1989), Vol. III, p. 1069] appear to be well positioned to explore these possibilities and to clarify other issues including the physics of wave launching and associated nonlinear processes.