首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Trial of Zidovudine Plus Lamivudine Versus Zidovu...
A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Trial of Zidovudine Plus Lamivudine Versus Zidovudine Plus Lamivudine Plus Didanosine in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1–Infected Thai Patients

 

作者: Chaiwat Ungsedhapand,   Eugene D. Kroon,   Surapol Suwanagool,   Kiat Ruxrungtham,   Nongluk Yimsuan,   Areerat Sonjai,   Sasiwimol Ubolyam,   Supranee Buranapraditkun,   Surapee Tiengrim,   Nadine Pakker,   Chaiyos Kunanusont,   Joep Lange,   David Cooper,   Praphan Phanuphak,  

 

期刊: JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes  (OVID Available online 2001)
卷期: Volume 27, issue 2  

页码: 116-123

 

ISSN:1525-4135

 

年代: 2001

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Antiretroviral treatment;naive;Didanosine;HIV;Lamivudine;Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy;Zidovudine

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and tolerability of a triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and didanosine therapy.DesignA randomized open-label trial.PatientsAntiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients with CD4+cell counts of 100 to 500 cells/&mgr;l.MethodsA total of 106 patients were randomly assigned to 300 mg of zidovudine (200 mg for body weight <60 kg) twice daily plus 150 mg of lamivudine twice daily plus 200 mg of didanosine (125 mg for body weight <60 kg) twice daily (n= 53) or to zidovudine plus lamivudine (n= 53) for 48 weeks.Main Outcome MeasuresDegree and duration of reduction of HIV-1 RNA load and increase in CD4+cell counts from baseline and development of drug-related toxicities.ResultsAt 48 weeks, triple drug therapy showed greater declines in plasma HIV-RNA levels from the beginning of treatment than double drug therapy (1.86 vs. 1.15 log10copies/ml, respectively;p< .001). The proportions of patients with HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml in an intention-to-treat analysis were 54.7% (29 of 53 patients) and 11.3% (6 of 53 patients) in the triple and double drug therapy, respectively (p= .001). There was no significant difference in increase of CD4 count.ConclusionTriple drug therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and didanosine was significantly more effective in inducing sustained immunologic and virologic responses than the double combination of zidovudine and lamivudine.

 



返 回