Remote sensing is an attractive source of data for land cover mapping applications. Mapping is generally achieved through the application of a conventional statistical classification, which allocates each image pixel to a land cover class. Such approaches are inappropriate for mixed pixels, which contain two or more land cover classes, and a fuzzy classification approach is required. When pixels may have multiple and partial class membership measures of the strength of class membership may be output and, if strongly related to the land cover composition, mapped to represent such fuzzy land cover. This type of representation can be derived by softening the output of a conventional ‘hard’ classification or using a fuzzy classification. The accuracy of the representation provided by a fuzzy classification is, however, difficult to evaluate. Conventional measures of classification accuracy cannot be used as they are appropriate only for ‘hard’ classifications. The accuracy of a classification may, however, be indicated by the way in which the strength of class membership is partitioned between the classes and how closely this represents the partitioning of class membership on the ground. In this paper two measures of the closeness of the land cover representation derived from a classification to that on the ground were used to evaluate a set of fuzzy classifications. The latter were based on measures of the strength of class membership output from classifications by a discriminant analysis, artificial neural network and fuzzy c-means classifiers. The results show the importance of recognising and accommodating for the fuzziness of the land cover on the ground. The accuracy assessment methods used were applicable to pure and mixed pixels and enabled the identification of the most accurate land cover representation derived. The results showed that the fuzzy representations were more accurate than the ‘hard’ classifications. Moreover, the outputs derived from the artificial neural network and the fuzzyc-means algorithm in particular were strongly related to the land cover on the ground and provided the most accurate land cover representations. The ability to appropriately represent fuzzy land cover and evaluate the accuracy of the representation should facilitate the use of remote sensing as a source of land cover data.