It is possible to determine the age of fishes with reasonable accuracy by reading the ‘growth rings’ (annuli) in hard parts (scale, otolith, opercular bone, vertebra and cross-section of dorsal or pectoral spine and fin rays). Primary growth increments in ‘otoliths’ can also be used as an alternative method of age determination. The traditional methods could be supplemented with more reliable fmorochrome and microradio-graphic techniques. The suitability of the use of hard parts and the techniques may vary among the species. It is essential that the ‘true rings’ be distinguished from other types of rings, such as false rings, larval rings and spawning rings through repeated examination of samples to avoid confusion and inaccuracy in age determination. The causes and the periodicity of ring formation may vary from species to species. The growth history of fishes could be traced by back calculation of length attained at different ages. Among the different types of growth equations, the Von Bertalanffy’s model appears to be the most suitable for fishes of both temperate and tropical regions. With slight modification, the same model may also serve to estimate the maximum theoretical calculated age (longevity) of fishes. The longevity of fishes show wide variations. The life-span may be short, intermediate and long. Whereas the lowest range of life-span (1-2 years) is exhibited by some species of lampreys and teleosts, there are species of dogfishes, sturgeons, paddlefishes, rockfishes and eels which have the life-span (70-152 years) in the highest range. A number of factors (size, sex, temperature, diet, reproduction, age at maturity and genetic composition) are believed to influence the longev