首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Distinguishing “Missing at Random” and “Missing Completely at Rand...
Distinguishing “Missing at Random” and “Missing Completely at Random”

 

作者: DanielF. Heitjan,   Srabashi Basu,  

 

期刊: The American Statistician  (Taylor Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 50, issue 3  

页码: 207-213

 

ISSN:0003-1305

 

年代: 1996

 

DOI:10.1080/00031305.1996.10474381

 

出版商: Taylor & Francis Group

 

关键词: Bayesian inference;Coarse data;Frequentist inference;Ignorability;Incomplete data;Likelihood inference;Missing data

 

数据来源: Taylor

 

摘要:

Missing at random (MAR) and missing completely at random (MCAR) are ignorability conditions—when they hold, they guarantee that certain kinds of inferences may be made without recourse to complicated missing-data modeling. In this article we review the definitions of MAR, MCAR, and their recent generalizations. We apply the definitions in three common incomplete-data examples, demonstrating by simulation the consequences of departures from ignorability. We argue that practitioners who face potentially non-ignorable incomplete data must consider both the mode of inference and the nature of the conditioning when deciding which ignorability condition to invoke.

 

点击下载:  PDF (765KB)



返 回