Missed lung cancer is an important medicolegal issue and is the second leading cause for malpractice actions against radiologists. Contributing factors to overlooked lung cancer can be ascribed to observer performance, lesion characteristics, and technical considerations. Of these, errors related to observer performance are probably the most important. Missed lung cancer does not necessarily constitute malpractice, but lesions of high conspicuity are more likely to be associated with an adverse legal outcome. Multiple strategies have been advocated to reduce the frequency of missed lung cancer. Several studies have emphasized the importance of careful comparison of the current radiograph with one or more prior examinations.