首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Probing and Oviposition-Related Activity of Summerform Pear Psylla (Homoptera: Psyllida...
Probing and Oviposition-Related Activity of Summerform Pear Psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) on Host and Nonhost Substrates

 

作者: David R. Horton,   James L. Krysan,  

 

期刊: Environmental Entomology  (OUP Available online 1990)
卷期: Volume 19, issue 5  

页码: 1463-1468

 

ISSN:0046-225X

 

年代: 1990

 

DOI:10.1093/ee/19.5.1463

 

出版商: Oxford University Press

 

关键词: Insecta;Cacopsylla pyricola;Psyllidae;probing behavior

 

数据来源: OUP

 

摘要:

Effects of host and nonhost substrates on probing and preoviposition activity were monitored for adult summerform pear psylla,Cacopsylla pyricolaFoerster. Tendency to initiate probing activity during a 15-min observation period was similar on a susceptible pear (Pyrus communisL. ‘Bartlett’), a presumed nonsusceptible pear (P. calleryanaDecne.), and apple, but was reduced on quince. Depriving pear psylla access to pear for 4–6 h or 14–16 h before the observation period increased the percentage of psylla that probed during the observation period; effects of host deprivation on tendency to probe were independent of substrate. Tendency to initiate probing onP. communiswas greater on lower leaf surfaces than upper leaf surfaces, which may suggest that probing is initiated in response to cues received at the leaf surface. The percentage of pear psylla that probed during the observation period was not affected by age ofP. communisfoliage. Mean probe duration and mean percentage of the 15-min observation period spent probing were unaffected by substrate; both measures increased linearly with amount of time that pear psylla were deprived of pear before the observation period. Mean percentage of the observation period spent in contact with the leaf surface was higher forP. communisandP. calleryanathan non-Pyrusspecies. Despite extensive probing activity on apple, very little preoviposition behavior was noted; similarly, age ofP. communisfoliage did not affect tendency to initiate probing behavior, but did affect preoviposition activity. These two results suggest that probing and preoviposition activities were released by different cues.

 

点击下载:  PDF (520KB)



返 回