首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Synthesis and reactivity of trinuclear complexes of platinum containing the single brid...
Synthesis and reactivity of trinuclear complexes of platinum containing the single bridging ligand SC4H8. Molecular structure of [NBu4]2[trans-PtCl2{(µ-SC4H8)Pt(C6F5)3}2]

 

作者: Rafaei Usón,  

 

期刊: Dalton Transactions  (RSC Available online 1989)
卷期: Volume 1, issue 6  

页码: 1011-1016

 

ISSN:1477-9226

 

年代: 1989

 

DOI:10.1039/DT9890001011

 

出版商: RSC

 

数据来源: RSC

 

摘要:

J. CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 101 1 Synthesis and Reactivity of Trinuclear Complexes of Platinum containing the Single Bridging Ligand SC,H,. Molecular Structure of [N Bu,],[trans-PtC12- .(( P-SC, H 8 ) Pt (C,F, 13121 * Rafael Uson, Juan Fornies, Milagros Tomas, and Irene Ara Departamento de Quimica lnorganica, lnstituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragon, Universidad de Zaragoza - C. S. I. C. 50009 Zaragoza, Spain Trinuclear complexes of the type [NBu,],[trans-PtX,{(p-SC,H,) Pt(C,F,),},] (X = CI, Br, I, or C,F,; SC,H, = tetrahydrothiophene) (1 )-(4) have been prepared from trans- [ PtX,(SC,H,),] and NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] (molar ratio 1 :2). The SC,H, ligands act as the single bridge between the central platinum atom and the two terminal ones. Attempts to prepare similar trinuclear complexes with singly bridging halide ligands failed since the reaction between frans- [ PtCl,(py),] (py = pyridine) and NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] (molar ratio 1 :2) does not take place, while trans- [ Ptl,(py),] or [ PtBr,(cod)] (cod = cyclo-octa-l,5-diene), under similar conditions, yield cis- respectively.The trinuclear derivatives (1 ) and (3) react with neutral ligands L to give different mononuclear complexes, depending on the ligand L: when L = PPh,, NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(SC,H,)] and cis-[PtX,(PPh,),]; when L = CO, NBU,[Pt(C,F,),(CO)] and trans-[PtCI,(SC,H,),]. The molecular structure of [NBu,],[trans-PtCI,{(p-SC,H,)Pt(C6F,),},] has been established by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. The compound forms triclinic crystals in the space group PT, with Z = 1 and unit-cell dimensions a = 12.463(3), b = 12.487(3), c = 15.1 37(3) A, a = 85.68(15), p = 66.04(2), and y = 87.04(1)”.The structure was refined to R = 0.048 and R’ = 0.048. The central platinum atom in the trinuclear anion [trans-PtCI,{(p-SC,H,) Pt( C,F,),),I2- lies on a crystallographic centre of symmetry and is bonded to two CI atoms and two S atoms (from two SC,H, ligands), the latter acting as bridging ligands between the central and the terminal Pt atoms. [ Pt ( c6F5)2(PY)21 and [ Bu412[ pt2(P-l )2(c6F5)41 or [ Pt ( C6F5),(cod)] and “ BU,] ,[ pt2( p- Br),( C,F,),] Platinum complexes containing weakly co-ordinating ligands are of interest’ both as regards the homogeneous activation of organic substrates and as useful intermediates for the synthesis of unusual types of compounds which are in- accessible from other more conventional starting compounds; for instance, we have recently reported the synthesis of neutral c~~-[M(C,X,),(OC,H~)~] (M = Pd or Pt; X = F or C1; OC,H8 = tetrahydrofuran) containing two weakly bonded molecules of OC,H8 which can readily be displaced by carbon monoxide, diphenylacetylene, and cis-dihalogeno complexes to give the unusual complexes cis-[M(C,X,),- (CO),],2,3 c~s-[M(C,F,),(P~C&P~),],~ tetrameric [(C,x5),- M(,-X’)M’(~O~)(,-X’)M(C,X~),(CI-X’)M’(CO~)(,-X’)],~ and M’ = Pd or Pt; X = F or C1; X’ = C1, Br, or I; cod = cyclo- octa- 1,5-diene)., Another promising precursor would be the complex NBu,- [Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] and more so since OCMe, is a weaker donor than OC,H8 and could therefore be more readily displaced.The synthesis of this complex can be accomplished by chloride abstraction from [NBu4],[PtC1(C6F,),] with AgC10, (1 : 1) in acetone solution. Attempts to isolate the complex by vacuum evaporation of the acetone solutions failed, since the co-ordinated acetone is given off and the binuclear C,F,-bridged complex [NBu,],[Pt,- (p-C,F,),(C,F,),] is obtained. This complex has been de- scribed el~ewhere.~ Notwithstanding, the acetone solutions behave as if they contain NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] and we trimeric [NBU,],[(C,X,),M(~-X’),M’(~-X’),M(C,X,)2] (M, * Bis(tetrabuty1ammonium) trans-2,2-dichloro- 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexakis- (pentafluoropheny1)- 1,2;2,3-bis(~-tetrahydrothiophene-S)-triplatinate. Supplementary data available: see Instructions for Authors, J.Chenz. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1989, Issue 1, pp. xiii-xx. have used them to prepare trinuclear platinum complexes of (X = C1, Br, I, or C,F,) containing two single-bridging SC,H, ligands. The molecular structure of one of these complexes (X = Cl) has been established by single-crystal X-ray studies and the reactivity of the complexes has been studied. stoicheiometry [NBU,] 2 [ tmt~-PtX,{ (p-SC,H8)Pt(C,F,),} 21 Results and Discussion (a) Preparation of Acetone Solutions of NBu,[Pt(C,F,),- (OCMe,)].-The 1 : 1 reaction between [NBU,],[P~C~(C,F,)~] and AgClO, in acetone results in the precipitation of AgCl. Upon partial evaporation and addition of n-hexane the colourless solution, which presumably contains NBU,[Pt(C,- F,),(OCMe,)], renders only oily residues and if the solution is evaporated to dryness a yellow solid, identified as [NBu,],- [Pt2(p-C,F,),(C,F,),] is obtained (80% yield).The bridging system (two C,F, groups) persists in the yellow dichloro- methane solution but is lost in the colourless acetone solution. Equation (1) summarizes the above observations. 2 [NBu,],[PtC1(C,F5),] + 2 AgCIO, - *gC1 evaporation 2 NBu,ClO, + 2 NBu,[??t(C,F,),(OCMe,)] - CNBU412[Pt2(~-C6F~)2(c6FS)~l + OCMe2 (l) Therefore, for our purposes we have used the colourless acetone solution, after filtering off the silver chloride precipitate. The solution also contains NBu,ClO, which does not interfere in the subsequent reactions.1012 J. CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 Table 1. Analytical results, melting points, and yields Analysis */% A r -l M.p.Yield Complex C ( I ) [ N B u4] 2 [ 1ran.y- P t C I 2 { ( p- S C 4 H 8) P t (C 6 F 5 ) 3 } ] 39.10 (39.35) * Calculated values in parentheses. H 3.80 (3.80) 3.65 (3.65) 3.55 (3.50) 3.50 (3.40) N X c"c> (%I 1.10 3.65 158 93 1.05 6.30 143 71 1.15 - 135 75 0.85 - 165 87 (1.20) (3.05) (1.15) (6.65) (1.10) (1.10) Figure. ORTEP drawing of the anion [frans-PtC1,((~-SC4H,)Pt(C,F,),),12 -. All non-metallic atoms are represented by arbitrarily small circles for clarity complexes we have two pairs of potentially bridging ligands, i.e. the halide ions and the neutral SC,Hg ligands. Whilst halide- bridged complexes are numerous, SC,H,-bridged complexes are scarce and none has hitherto been reported for platinum. Moreover, most of the reported complexes [Fe,(CO),- [Mn2(CO),(SC,H8)] l 1 also have other bridging ligands and/or metal-metal bonds and only the silver complex [Ag(SC,H,),]BF,' contains chains of silver atoms singly bridged by SC,H, along with another SC,H, molecule linked to each silver atom as a terminal ligand. When acetone solutions of NBu,[P~(C,F,)~(OCM~,)] and tranS-[PtX,(SC,Hg),] (molar ratio 2: 1) are evaporated to dryness the trinuclear derivatives [NBu,],[ trans-PtX,((p- SC,H,)Pt(C,F,),},] are obtained [equation (2)].If the (SC4H8)21,8 [Ta2C16(SC4H8)3),9 [Ta2Br6(SC4H8)31,10 and t?-anS-[ PtX,(SC4H8)2] 4- 2 NBu,[ Pt ( c6 F 5 ) ,( oc Me ,)] --+ CNBu41 Z[trans-PtXZ ((p-SC4H8)Pt(C6F5>3} 21 + 2OCMe, (2) X = C1 (l), Br (2), or 1(3) reaction is carried out in a 1 : 1 molar ratio the same trinuclear complexes are obtained, albeit mixed with unreacted trans- [PtX,(SC,H&].On the other hand trans-[Pt(C,F,),- (SC,H,),] reacts with NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] yielding the trinuclear [NBU,l,[trans-Pt(C,F,),((C1-SC,H,)Pt(C,F~),~,] (4). Analytical data and melting points for complexes (1)-(4) are collected in Table 1. Acetone solutions of these complexes are highly conducting but their 'H n.m.r. spectra in (CD,),CO, for the SC,Hg signals, coincide with the spectra of trans- [PtX,(SC,Hg),] indicating the existence of an equilibrium (2) which is totally displaced to the left in the presence of the solvent. Thus the latter must be totally eliminated (evaporating to dryness) in order to displace the equilibrium to the right. (c) Structure of [NB~,]~[trans-PtC1,((~c~H,)Pt(~~F~)~}~] (1)-To establish the structure of complex (1) by X-ray diffraction, single crystals were grown (at -25 "C) by slow diffusion (ca.2 weeks) of n-hexane into a CH2Cl, solution of the complex. Table 2 lists atomic co-ordinates. The compound consists of discrete trinuclear anions and NBu,+ cations in a 1 : 2 ratio. The structure of the [trans-PtC1,{(p-SC,H,)Pt(C,F,),),12 - anion is showed in the Figure. Selected bond distances and angles are collected in Table 3. The central platinum atoms sits on a crystallographic centre of symmetry. The central platinum atom [Pt(l)] is bonded to two terminal chlorine atoms and two bridging SC,H, ligands in a trans- square-planar environment as in the starting material trans- [PtCl,(SC,H,),]. The Pt(1)-C1 distance is 2.285(5) A and Pt(1)-S is 2.295(5) A.The Pt(1)-C1 distances are in the usualJ. CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 1013 Table 2. Fractional atomic co-ordinates ( x lo4) and estimated standard deviations for [NBu,], [trUns-PtC1,{(~-SC4H,)Pt(C,F,),),] Atom X Y Z Atom X Y Z 0) 222(4) 1 960(4) - 82( 1) -1 141(10) - 80( 12) 2 310(15) 3 611(12) 2 593(9) - 2 467(8) -3 018(9) -1 341(12) 929( 12) 1541(9) - 2 640( 8) - 3 280(10) - 1 718(12) 5 25( 1 2) 1215(9) 4 705(12) 1 620(17) 1366(35) 105(47) 674( 12) 564(12) 1 786(12) 2 452(12) - 683(26) 8(12) 10 Ooo(0) 7 920( 1) 9 643(4) 10 232(6) 6 795( 11) 5 866( 1 1) 5 832(13) 6 703(13) 7 665(11) 6 700(9) 4 733(10) 3 347(9) 3 918(11) 5 919(9) 8 852(9) 9 365(11) 9 253(11) 8 619(11) 8 087(10) 7 282(11) 10 113(16) 11 341(24) 11 551(32) 10 708(17) 7 279(10) 6 804(10) 6 328(10) 6 326(10) 6 800(10) o m 2 124(1) 1427(3) - 905(4) 794(9) - 928(9) -1 864(9) - 1 058(11) 626(9) 3 111(9) 3 961(10) 4 014(12) 3 206( 14) 2 371(10) 3 681(8) 5 527(9) 6 375(8) 5 341(9) 2 658(10) 1353(16) 1488(22) 2 107(34) 2 211(16) 764(8) 355(8) 3 499(9) - 529(8) - 1 003(8) - 594(8) 1 896(12) -439(10) - 1 612(10) - 1 915(10) - 1 044( 10) 129( 10) 432(10) - 653( 10) - 1 817(10) -2 183(10) - 1 386(10) - 222( 10) 145( 10) 4 166(16) 4 934(20) 4 364(24) 5 014(32) 5 873(16) 5 626(22) 6 733(22) 6 606(24) 5 076( 15) 4 035(16) 4 542(22) 3 568(22) 3 736( 17) 4 154(21) 3 063(28) 3 436(34) 7 277(10) 6 406(8) 6 108(8) 5 079(8) 4 347(8) 4 645(8) 5 674(8) 8 421(9) 8 743(9) 9 023(9) 8 981(9) 8 659(9) 8 379(9) 8 308( 16) 9 278(19) 10 166(24) 11 166(32) 6 931(16) 6 613(21) 6 230(21) 5 91 lf23) 7 495(14) 7 829( 15) 7 995(21) 8 303(20) 6 417(16) 5 353(20) 4 643(28) 3 571(35) 290(8) 2 719(8) 3 122(8) 3 555(8) 3 585(8) 3 182(8) 2 749(8) 3 538(7) 4 058(7) 5 013(7) 5 449(7) 4 928(7) 3 973(7) 2 330(13) 2 067(16) 1633(20) 1408(26) 180!(14) 897( 18) 163(19) 3 493(12) 4 422( 14) 5 174(19) 6 174(18) 2 972( 14) 3 329( 17) 3 588(23) 3 841(30) - 739(20) Table 3.Bond distances (A) and angles (") and their estimated standard deviations for [ ~ ~ u , ] , [ r r ~ n s - ~ t ~ ~ , { ( ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ t ( C ~ F ~ ) ~ ~ S-Pt(1) S-Pt(2) C( 1 1)-Pt(2) C( 1 )-s C(61-V 1) C(8)-F(3) C(lO)-F(5) C( 1 3)-F( 7) C( 15)-F(9) C( 18)-F( 1 1) C(20)-F( 13) C1( 1)-Pt( I)-s C(l 1)-Pt(2)-S C( 17)-Pt(2)-S C( 17)-Pt(2)-C( 1 1) C(1)-S-Pt(1) C(4)-S-Pt( 1) C(4)-S-C( 1) C( 3 1 )-N-C( 23) C( 3 5)-N-C( 23) C(35)-N-C(3 1) C(3kC(2tC( 1) C( 3)-C(4)-S C(lO)-C(5)-Pt(2) C(5)-C(6)-F( 1) C(8)-C(7)-F(2) C(7)-C(8tF(3) C( 10)-C(9)-F(4) C(5)-C( lO)-F(5) 2.295(5) 2.303(4) 2.023(9) 1.825( 17) 1.3 12( 17) 1.377(15) 1.3OO( 18) 1.338( 15) 1.322( 16) 1.358( 15) 1.357( 13) 94.2(2) 176.5(3) 93.q 3) 87.2(4) 11 1.9(7) 103.9(8) 95.1 (13) 11 1.9( 13) 105.5(13) 112.0(13) 110.8(26) 106.1(24) 117.5(4) 120.7(7) 119.8(7) 118.6( 10) 123.6(9) 124.6(6) C(22)-F( 15) C(27)-N C(35)-N C(3)-C(2) C(24)-C(23) C(26)-C(25) C(29)-C(28) C(32)-C(3 1) C(34)-C(33) C( 37)-C( 36) C( 16)-C( 1 1 )-Pt(2) C( 1 1)-C( 12)-F(6) C(14)-C( 13)-F(7) C( 13)-C(14)-F(8) C( 1 1 )-C( 16)-F( 10) C( 16)-C( 15)-F(9) C(22)-C( 17)-Pt(2) C( 19)-C(20)-F( 13) C( 22kC(2 1 )-F( 14) C( 17)-C(22)-F( 15) C(25)-C(24)-C(23) C( 28)-C( 27)-N c(30)-c( 29)-C( 28) C(33)-C(32)-C(3 1) C( 36)-C( 3 5)-N C( 17)-C( 18)-F( 1 1) C(20)-C( 19)-F( 12) 1.280( 14) 1.574(21) 1.562(23) 1.488(46) 1.509(28) 1.465(41) 1.46 l(30) 1.545(23) 1.567(31) 1.5 5 8( 36) 122.7(3) 1 25.1 (6) 116.3(7) 120.0(7) 122.0(7) 121.8(7) 118.6(3) 124.1(5) 118.1(7) 12 1.2(8) 120.2(7) 120.3( 7) 107.6( 19) 11 1.3(15) 112.7(22) 106.8( 16) 110.9(16) CI(1)-Pt( 1) C( 5)-Pt(2) C( 17)-Pt(2) C(4)-S C(7)-F(2) C(9)-F(4) C( 12)-F(6) C( 14)-F( 8) C( 16)-F( 10) C( 19)-F( 12) C(21)-F(14) 2.285(5) 2.089( 10) 2.097(9) 1.856(21) 1.354(18) 1.329( 18) 1.270( 14) 1.359(13) 1.306( 15) 1.334(15) 1.3 1 3( 16) 9 1.1 (4) 88.3( 5) 17 1.4(5) 118.4(2) 109.7(6) 1 15.4(7) 109.8( 13) 105.1(12) 112.7(13) 102.3( 17) 116.2(29) 122.4(4) 119.3(7) 120.2(7) 12 1.4( 10) 116.3(9) 115.4(6) 117.3(3) C( 13)-C( 12)-F(6) C(12)-C(13bF(7) C( 15)-C( 16)-F( 10) C( 18)-c( 17>-Pt(2) C( 19)-C( 18)-F( 1 1) C(18)-C(19)-F(12) C(21)-C(20)-F( 13) C(21 )-C(22)-F( 15) C(24)-C(23)-N C(26)-C(25)-C(24) C(29)-C(28)-C(27) C(32)-c(3 1)-N C(34)-C(33)-C(32) C(37EC(36)-C(35) C(38)-C(37)-C(36) C( 14)-C( 15)-F(9) 1.558(22) 1.555(20) 1.562(36) 1.433(48) 1.535(32) 1.600(28) 1.5 19(32) 1.540(29) 1.542(28) 1.468(44) 114.8(6) 1 23.7( 7) 118.0(7) 118.2(7) 121.3(3) 115.9(5) 121.9(7) 119.7(7) 114.1(16) 11 1.5(26) 108.0( 20) 1 13.2( 13) 112.4(20) 101.1(21) 104.6(28) 118.8(8) range for Pt"-Cl (terminal).I3 The Cl-Pt(1)-S angle is 94.2(2)'.The terminal Pt(2) and Pt(2') are located in identical square- planar environments formed by three C,F, groups and a SC,H, bridging ligand.The Pt-C distances of the C,F,.groups in mutually trans position are identical within the experimental error [2.089(10) and 2.097(9) A], while the Pt-C distance corresponding to the C,F, trans to the SC,H, is shorter [2.023(9) A]. Angles between Pt(2)-cis ligand bonds are in the range 87.2(4)-93.8(3)' and the angles C(1 ltPt(2)-S and C( 17)-Pt(2)-C(5) are 176.5(3) and 171.4(5)O respectively. Atom1014 J. CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 Table 4. Some relevant i.r. absorptions (cm-') Complex X-sensitive" Others 1056vs, 1044s 1056vs, 1045s 1055vs, 1 044s 1055vs 802s, 788m, 774s 958vs 1634w, 1 607w, 1495vs, (2) 803s, 790m, 773s 958vs 1634w, 1606w, 1495vs, 803s, 790m, 773s 957vs 1 634w, 1 606w, 1495vs, 804s, 776s, 771s 959vs 1633m, 1605m, 1498vs, (1) (3) (4) SC4H8 NBu, 1278w, 1255vw, 885m 1247w, 517w 1 277w, 1255vw, 885m 1247w, 516w 1277w, 1255vw, 884m 1247w, 517w 1271m, 1259w, 884m 1255m, 512w (I E.Maslowsky, jun., 'Vibrational Spectra of Organometallic Compounds,' Wiley, New York, 1977, p. 437 and refs. therein. v(Pt-C1) 345w cm-'; cf: 346 cm-' for trans-[PtC1,(SC,H8),]. Pt( 1) is linked to Pt(2) and Pt(2') by two single bridging SC,H, ligands. The angle Pt(2)-S-Pt(l) is 118.4(2)' similar to the Ag-S-Ag angle [ 126.59(7)'] found in [Ag(SC,H,),]BF,.' Smaller M-S-M angles have been found in other complexes containing bridging SC4H8 or SR2 groups, e.g. [Ta2C16- ( S Me 2 ) ,] [ 68.9( 2)] ,9 [ P t B r "( S E t 2 ) 2] [ 9 8.1 ( 5)], ' and [ Fe , - (CO),(SC,H,),] (73.8) although in these complexes there are metal-metal bonds and/or other bridging ligands.The co-ordination planes around Pt(2) and Pt(1) form an angle of 93.05(25)'. The Pt-S distances are the same within the experimental error [Pt( 1)-S 2.295(5), Pt(2)-S 2.303(4) A] and slightly longer than analogous distances found in [{PtBr,(p-SEt,)),] [2.21(1) and 2.25(1) A].'" It should be noted that these Pt-S bridging distances are slightly shorter than the Pt-S terminal one found in [(C,F,),(sC,H8)PtAg(PPh3)] [Pt-S 2.328(3) A] ' which can be considered unusual (for instance the reverse is the case with bridging and terminal halide ligands) but not unique, since shorter bridging than terminal M-S distances have also been reported in other cases: [(PtBr,(p-SEt,)),], and [Pd(p-Br)- Br(SMe2)] z,' [ T ~ ~ C ~ ~ ( S C L ~ H ~ ) , I and [Ta2C16(SMe2)31,9 [Ta2 Br6( SC4H 8 ) 31, ' (SC4H8)1*" [ Mn2(CO)9(SC4H8 >I, and [Mn 2 (co)8- ( d ) 1.r.and N.M.R. Spectra.-Table 4 collects some relevant i.r. absorptions. Although complex (4) should present four absorp- tions due to the X-sensitive modes of the C6F5 groups [three for C,F5 groups bonded to the terminal platinum atoms and one for the C,F5 (trans) bonded to the central platinum atom], only three strong absorptions are observed in our i.r. spectrum. Probably one of the absorptions due to the C,F5 bonded to the terminal platinum atoms which appear for complexes (1)-(3) as a medium-intensity band at 788-790 cm-' is overlapped with that due to the C6F, group bonded to the central platinum atom.The three absorptions of (4) are strong, while complexes (1)-(3) show two strong and one medium absorption in this region. In the region 1 30&1 250 cm-' absorptions due to the SC,H, are present. The mononuclear derivatives trans- [PtX,(SC,H,),] show in this region a very similar pattern of two strong and very close absorptions, located at 1269 and 1253 cm-', while the trinuclear complexes also show two absorptions although more separated and of medium intensity (see Table 4). These data suggest that complexes (1)-(4) have the same structure with bridging SC,H, ligands. Their very low solubility in CDCI, prevents 'H n.m.r. studies in this solvent. The 19F n.m.r. spectrum of (4) in CDCl3-CH2CI2 shows a very complicated pattern due to the presence in the complex of many inequivalent C6F5 groups; since no signals appear in the region corresponding to bridging C,F, g r o ~ p s , ~ the complex only contains terminal ones.(e) Reactivity of the Trinuclear Complexes (1)-(3).-If a weak donor such as acetone causes splitting of the bridge system in the trinuclear complexes, it is expected that stronger ligands will also destroy the polynuclear structure. This expectation was fulfilled in all the cases studied, but two extreme behaviours have been observed: (i) splitting of the Pt(centra1)-SC,H, bonds with simultaneous isomerisation and, (ii) splitting of the Pt(termina1)-SC,H, bonds. The former behaviour is illustrated by the reaction (3) (X = C1 or I) with PPh, in CH2C12, the latter by the reaction (4) with CO.As may be seen, PPh, acts upon the central platinum atom which is the less electron-rich metal centre, since it is bonded to only two anionic o-donor ligands whilst CO attacks the terminal platinum atoms, which being bonded to three anionic o-donor ligands are electron-richer metal centres. Probably the poorer o-donor and the better n- acceptor abilities of the CO ligand are responsible for its different behaviour. The carbonyl and phosphine complexes have previously been de~cribed.~.' (f) Attempts to prepare Halide-bridged Trinuclear Com- plexes.-We have discussed above (b) that the reaction between NBu4[Pt(C,F5),(OCMe2)] and trans-[PtX,(SC4H,),], con- taining two pairs of potentially bridging ligands, could give S- bridged or X-bridged polynuclear derivatives. Since the former, and rarer, possibility has been demonstrated, it was tempting to see whether the second one could be verified by using a similar reagent containing neutral ligands with donor atoms unable to act as a bridge, e.g. trans-[PtX,(py),] (py = pyridine) or [PtBr,(cod)] thereby forcing the halide ligands to act as a bridging ligand.Surprisingly, under similar conditions (stirring, for 1 h, room temperature) as above [equation (2)] no reaction occurred between NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] and trans- [PtCl,(py),] and upon evaporation of the solutions unreacted starting materials were recovered. By substituting trans-[Pt12- (py),] for the dichloro derivative reaction (5) takes place but the isolated products are the result of ligand rearrangement. An analogous rearrangement has been observed in the reaction between NBu4[Pt(C,F5),(OCMe2)] and [PtBr,(cod)] which yields "Bu412 CPt 2 (P-Br) 2(C6F 5 141 and [Pt(C&5 12 (cod)].J.CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 1015 Experimental The C, H, and N analyses were carried out with a Perkin-Elmer 240-B micronanalyzer. Chlorine and bromine analyses were made as described by White,I7 a few milligrams of sucrose being added to facilitate combustion." 1.r. spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 599 spectrophotometer (Nujol mulls between polyethylene plates). Molar conductivities were determined in 5 x lop4 mol dm-, acetone solutions. Proton n.m.r. spectra were recorded on a Varian XL 200 spectrometer (200 MHz for 'H) in (CD,),CO or CDCl,-CH,Cl,. Literature methods were used to prepare trans-[PtCl,(SC,- Hg),],l6 tr~ns-[PtCl,(py),],'~ and [NBU,]~[P~C~(C,F,)~].~* trans-[PtI,(SC,H,),].-To a suspension of PtI,21 (0.2 g, 4.45 x lW4 mol) in CH,CI, (25 cm3), SC,H, (78.55 p1, 8.9 x lo-, mol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h.After filtration, the resulting solution was evaporated to dryness and the orange residue was washed with n-hexane. Yield 95%. trans-[PtI,(py),].-To PtI, (0.3 g, 6.7 x lo-, mol) suspended, in CH,C1,(30 cm3), py (106 pl, 13.36 x lo-, mol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 h. After filtration, the resulting yellow-orange solution was evaporated to dryness and the residue was treated with Pr'OH (10 cm3) yielding a yellow solid, which consisted of a mixture of cis- and trans-[PtI,(py),]. This was dissolved in acetone (ca.3 cm3) and water (ca. 30 cm3) and py (0.5 cm3) were added. After refluxing for 3 h, the yellow precipitate formed, trans-[PtI,(py),], was filtered off and washed with Pr'OH. Yield 72%. trans-[PtBr,(SC,H,),].-To a CH,Cl, (25 cm3) solution of trans-[PtI,(SC,H,),] (0.5 g, 7.99 x lW4 rnol), AgBr (0.30 g, 1.59 x lop3 mol) was added and the mixture, protected from the light, was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. After filtration, the solution obtained was evaporated to dryness and the residue was washed with Pr'OH, yielding a yellow solid. Yield 93%. [NBU,],[~~~~~-P~X,((~-S~~~,)P~(C~F~)~)~] [X = C1 (I), Br (2), 1 (3), or C,F, (4)].-A typical preparation was as follows. To a CH2C1,-acetone (6:l) (35 cm3) solution of [NBu,],[PtCl(C,F,),] (0.5 g, 4.11 x lop4 mol), AgClO, (0.0852 g, 4.11 x lop4 mol) was added and the mixture, protected from the light, was stirred for 30 min.To the resulting colourless solution, after filtration of the AgCl formed, trans- [PtCl,(SC,H,),] (0.0908 g, 2.05 x lo-, mol) was added, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and then evaporated to dryness. The residue was washed with isopropyl alcohol yielding a pale yellow solid which was filtered off and washed with n-hexane. Complexes (2)-(4) were prepared similarly, using the same amounts of [NBu,],[PtCl(C,F,),] and AgClO, as for (l), and trans-[PtBr,(SC,H,),] (0.1089 g, 2.05 x lop4 mol) for (2), trans-[PtI,(SC,H,),] (0.1281 g , 2.05 x lo4 mol) for (3), and Yields are reported in Table 1.trUnS-[Pt(C6F,),(sC,H8),] (0.145 g, 2.05 X mOl) for (4). Reaction of[NBu,] ,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] with trans-[PtX,- (py),] (X = C1 or I) or [PtBr,(cod)].-To a CH,CI,-acetone (2: 1) solution (30 cm3) of NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] (0.2055 mmol), trans-[PtCl,(py),] (0.0436 g, 0.1028 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. The resulting solution was evaporated to dryness and the pale yellow residue washed with isopropyl alcohol. By washing this residue with diethyl ether, a white residue, identified as a mixture of trans- [PtCl,(py),] and NBu,CIO,, and a yellow solution were obtained. When the yellow solution was evaporated to dryness and treated with Pr'OH-hexane, [NBu,],[Pt,(p-C,F,),- (C6F5),] (yield 58%) was obtained. The reaction between NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] and trans- [PtI,(py),] under similar conditions renders a mixture of trans- was separated with MeOH in which the neutral complex is insoluble and the anionic one is soluble.The complex NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(OCMe,)] reacted with [PtBr,(cod)] under similar conditions yielding a mixture of [Pt(C,F,),(cod)] and NBu,[Pt2(p-Br),(C,F5),] which was separated with MeOH. Reaction of [NBu,] ,[ trans-PtX, { (p-SC,H ,)Pt(C,F ,),I ,] (X = C1 or I) with PPh,.-To a CH,CI, solution of complex (1) (0.15 g, 6.46 x lop5 mol), PPh, (0.034 g, 1.129 x lo4 mol) was added; the solution was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and then evaporated to dryness. The residue was treated with Et,O (15 cm3) and the resulting white solid was treated with MeOH (10 cm3) to give a white residue of cis-[PtCl,(PPh,),] (identi- fied by C and H analyses and its i.r.spectrum) and a colourless solution. From the solution NBu,[Pt(C,F,),(SC,H,)] was obtained by evaporating almost to dryness. When [NBu,],[trans-PtI,{ (p-SC,H8)Pt(C,F,),),1 (3) ' was used, under similar conditions, cis-[PtI,(PPh,),] and NBu,[Pt(C,F ,),(SC4H ,)] were obtained. Reaction of [NBu,],[tran~-PtC1,((p-~~~€-I,)~t(~~~~)~)~] with C0.-Through a CH2Cl, (25 cm3) solution of complex (1) (0.15 g), CO was bubbled for 15 min and the resulting solution was evaporated to dryness. The residue was treated with diethyl ether, yielding a pale yellow solid identified as trans-CPtC1,- (SC,H,),]. The ether solution was evaporated to dryness and the resulting solid was treated with MeOH. The insoluble residue was identified as trans-[PtC1,(SC4H,),] and the MeOH solution was evaporated to dryness yielding NBu,[Pt(C,F,),- (CO)] ' (yield 72%).X-Ray Structure Analysis.-Crystal data. C76H88C12F30- N,Pt,S,, M = 2 319.8, triclinic, a = 12.463(3), b = 12.487(3), c = 15.137(3) A, a = 85.68(15), p = 66.04(2), y = 87.04(1)", U = 2 146 A3 (by refinement of 28 values for 70 reflections including Friedel pairs, in the range 25-36'), space group Pi, 2 = 1, D, = 1.79 g cm-,, F(OO0) = 1 112, size 0.25 x 0.04 x 0.3 mm, p(Mo-K,) = 48.7 cm-'. Data collection and processing. Siemens/Stoe AED2 four- circle diffractometer, monochromated Mo-K, radiation (A = 0.71069 A), scan range 4 d 28 < 45'. Index range: two sets ( 4 h, & h, & k, - 1), total number of reflections 11 210, unique reflections 5 315, 3 069 with F, 3 50(F,) used for all calculations.Scan method -28. Room temperature. Three check reflections were measured every 45 min. They showed an average loss of intensity of 19% during the data collection. An interpolative decay correction was applied. Absorption correction ( 6 ~ scans, with transmission factors 0.2494.565). Structure analysis and rejinement. Heavy-atom method. Refinement on F to R 0.048, R' 0.048. All atoms of the anionic part of the compound were treated as anisotropic, the remaining atoms as isotropic. Phenyl rings were regarded as idealised rigid groups with C-C 1.395 A. Weighting scheme w = K/[02(Fo) + gFo2] with K = 1.1996 and g = 0.0017. Maximum shiftlerror 0.01 1; highest peak in difference map 0.8 e 399 parameters.Program system SHELX 76.,, Additional material available from the Cambridge Crystal- lographic Data Centre comprises thermal parameters. [Pt(C6F5)2(py)21 ,, and [NBU412[Pt2(p-1)2(C6F5)41 ', which k, + Acknowledgements We thank the Direccion General de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnica for financial support (project PB85-0128) and for a research grant (to I. A.).1016 J. CHEM. SOC. DALTON TRANS. 1989 References 1 J. A. Davies and F. R. Hartley, Chem. Rev., 1981, 81, 79. 2 R. Uson, J. ForniCs, M. Tomas, and B. Menjon, Organometallics, 1985, 4, 1912. 3 R. Uson, J. Fornies, M. Tomas, and B. Menjon, Organometallics, 1986, 5, 1581. 4 R. Uson, J. Forniks, M. Tomas, B. Menjon, and A. J. Welch, J. Organomet. Chem., 1986, 304, C24. 5 R. Uson, J. ForniCs, M. Tomas, B. Menjon, and A. J. Welch, Organometallics, 1988, 7 , 13 18. 6 R. Uson, J. ForniCs, M. Tomas, B. Menjon, J. Carnicer, and A. J. Welch, unpublished work. 7 R. Uson, J. Fornies, M. Tomas, J. M. Casas, F. A. Cotton, L. R. Falvello, and R. Llusar, Organometallics, 1988, 7 , 2279; R. Uson, J. Fornies, M. Tomas, J. M. Casas, and R. Navarro, J. Chem. SOC., Dalton Trans., 1989, 169. 8 F. A. Cotton and J. M. Troup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974,96, 5070. 9 F. A. Cotton and R. C. Najjar, Inorg. Chem., 1981,20, 2716. 10 J. L. Templeton, W. C. Dorman, J. C. Clardy, and R. E. McCarley, 1 1 E. Guggolz, E. Layer, F. Oberdorfer, and M. Ziegler, Z. Natur- 12 B. Noren and A. Oskarsson, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A, 1984, 38, Inorg. Chem., 1978, 17, 1263. forsch., Teil B, 1985, 40, 77. 479. 13 F. R. Hartley, ‘The Chemistry of Platinum and Palladium,’ Applied 14 D. L. Sales, J. Stokes, and P. Woodward, J. Chem. SOC. A, 1968, 15 F. A. Cotton, L. R. Falvello, R. Uson, J. Fornies, M. Tomas, J. M. 16 R. Uson, J. ForniCs, F. Martinez, and M. Tomas, J. Chem. SOC., 17 D. C. White, Mikrochim. Acta, 1961, 449. 18 R. Bock, ‘Aufschlussmethoden der anorganischen und organischen 19 G. B. Kauffman, Inorg. Synth., 1963, 7 , 249. 20 R. Uson, J. Fornies, M. Tomas, and R. Fandos, J. Organomet. 21 G. R. Argue and J. J. Banewicz, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1963,25,923. 22 R. Uson, J. ForniCs, J. Gimeno, P. Espinet, and R. Navarro, J. 23 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX 76 Program for Crystal Structure Science, London, 1973, p. 490 and refs. therein. 1852. Casas, and I. Ara, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 1366. Dalton Trans., 1980, 888. Chemie,’ Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1972, p. 110. Chem., 1984, 263, 253. Organomet Chem., 1974, 81, 115. Determination, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 1976. Received 14th Jury 1988; Paper 8/02837K

 

点击下载:  PDF (754KB)



返 回