A composite model of the auditory periphery, based upon a unique analysis technique for deriving filter response characteristics from cat auditory‐nerve fibers, is presented. The model is distinctive in its ability to capture a significant broadening of auditory‐nerve fiber frequency selectivity as a function of increasing sound‐pressure level within a computationally tractable time‐invariant structure. The output of the model shows the tonotopic distribution of synchrony activity of single fibers in response to the steady‐state vowel [q] presented over a 40‐dB range of sound‐pressure levels and is compared with the population‐response data of Young and Sachs (1979). The model, while limited by its time invariance, accurately captures most of the place‐synchrony response patterns reported by the Johns Hopkins group. In both the physiology and in the model, auditory‐nerve fibers spanning a broad tonotopic range synchronize to the first formant (F1), with the proportion of units phase‐locked toF1increasing appreciably at moderate to high sound‐pressure levels. A smaller proportion of fibers maintain phase locking to the second and third formants across the same intensity range. At sound‐pressure levels of 60 dB and above, the vast majority of fibers with characteristic frequencies greater than 3 kHz synchronize toF1(512 Hz), rather than to frequencies in the most sensitive portion of their response range. On the basis of these response patterns it is suggested that neural synchrony is thedominantauditory‐nerve representation of formant information under ‘‘normal’’ listening conditions in which speech signals occur across a wide range of intensities and against a background of unpredictable and frequently intense acoustic interference.