ObjectiveTo determine whether use of a hygroscopic and hydrophobic heat and moisture exchanger (HME) for 7 days without change affects its efficiency in long-term, mechanically ventilated, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.DesignProspective, randomized, controlled clinical study comparing two combined HMEs.SettingMedical intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital.PatientsLong-term, mechanically ventilated, COPD patients compared with non-COPD patients.InterventionsIn the first part of the study, COPD patients were studied with the Hygroster HME changed once a week. For the second part, the Hygroster was assessed in non-COPD patients and compared with the Hygrobac HME used in COPD and non-COPD patients for 1 wk without change. Devices could be changed if hygrometric measurements indicated insufficient humidity delivery.Measurements and Main ResultsDaily measurements were recorded for inspired gas temperature and relative and absolute humidity. Ventilatory variables, clinical indicators of efficient humidification, were also recorded. No tracheal tube occlusion occurred. However, contrary to the manufacturer advertisement, the Hygroster experienced surprisingly low values for absolute humidity in both COPD and non-COPD patients. Such events did not occur with the Hygrobac. Absolute humidity with the Hygroster was constantly and significantly lower during the 7-day study period than with the Hygrobac. Absolute humidity measured in COPD patients was identical to that measured in the rest of the study population with both HMEs.ConclusionsManufacturer specifications and bedside measurements of absolute humidity differed considerably for the Hygroster, which in certain instances did not achieve efficient humidification in both COPD and non-COPD patients. This did not occur with the Hygrobac, which performed well throughout the 7-day period in both COPD and non-COPD patients. Our results speak for independent andin vivoevaluation of HMEs.