首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Selectivity and antagonism of chemokine receptors
Selectivity and antagonism of chemokine receptors

 

作者: Timothy N.C. Wells,   Christine A. Power,   Manjula Lusti‐Narasimhan,   Arlene J. Hoogewerf,   Robert M. Cooke,   Chun‐wa Chung,   Manuel C. Peitsch,   Amanda E. I. Proudfoot,  

 

期刊: Journal of Leukocyte Biology  (WILEY Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 59, issue 1  

页码: 53-60

 

ISSN:0741-5400

 

年代: 1996

 

DOI:10.1002/jlb.59.1.53

 

出版商: Wiley

 

数据来源: WILEY

 

摘要:

AbstractThe chemokine superfamily can be sub‐divided into two groups based on their amino terminal cysteine spacing. The CXC chemokines are primarily involved in neutrophil‐mediated inflammation and, so far, two human receptors have been cloned. The CC chemokines tend to be involved in chronic inflammation, and recently we have cloned a fourth leukocyte receptor for this group of ligands. Understanding what makes one receptor bind its range of agonists is important if we are to develop potent selective antagonists. We have started to investigate the molecular basis of this receptor selectivity by looking at why CC chemokines do not bind to the CXC receptors in several ways. First, we looked at the role of the three‐dimensional structure of the ligand, and have solved the three‐dimensional structure of RANTES using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The structure is similar to that already determined for the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein‐1β, and it has a completely different dimer interface to that of the CXC chemokine interleukin‐8 (IL‐8). However, the monomer structures of all the chemokines are very similar, and at physiological concentrations the proteins are likely to be monomeric. Second, by examining all the known CC and CXC chemokines, we have found a region that differs between the two subfamilies. Mutations of one of the residues in this region, Leu‐25 in IL‐8, to tyrosine (which is conserved at this position in CC chemokines) enables the mutant IL‐8 to bind CC‐chemokine receptor‐1 (CC‐CKR‐1) and introduces monocyte chemoattractant activity. Using other mutations in this region, we can show a direct interaction with the N‐terminus of CC‐CKR‐1. Third, we have found that modification of the amino terminus of RANTES by addition of one amino acid makes it into an antagonist with nanomolar potency. Taken together, this data suggests a two‐site model for receptor activation and for selectivity between CC and CXC chemokines, with an initial receptor contact provided by the main body of the chemokine, and activation provided by the amino terminal region.

 

点击下载:  PDF (1466KB)



返 回