首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 A Comparison of Total Body Water AnalysesBioelectric Impedance Analysis Versus the Trit...
A Comparison of Total Body Water AnalysesBioelectric Impedance Analysis Versus the Tritiated Water Method

 

作者: Sidney Miller,   Robert Carlson,   Elliott Fegelman,   Jose Quinones,   Robert Finley,  

 

期刊: Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 20, issue 5  

页码: 363-366

 

ISSN:0273-8481

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) is used to measure the body composition and total body water of normal subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine if the hydration of patients with burns could be assessed by BIA. Assessments of total body water as determined by BIA and the tritiated water method were prospectively compared. The 2 analyses were performed 48 hours after admission for 5 patients with acute burns to determine the correlation of the 2 methods. The patients had a mean age of 36.4 ± 14.7 years (range, 20–56 years), a mean burn size of 39.4% ± 15.9% of the body surface area (range, 23%-65%), and a mean full-thickness burn size of 27.7% of the body surface area. The total body water was measured on admission and again at 48 hours postburn. There is an excellent relationship between BIA and tritiated-water-method determinations of the total body water of patients with severe burns (r= 0.958). This correlation suggests that BIA provides an accurate measure of total body water, and so it is a reliable means of monitoring fluid resuscitation in patients with burns. (J Burn Care Rehabil 1999;20:363–6)

 

点击下载:  PDF (289KB)



返 回