AbstractThe possibility of increasing the herbage utilized over a grazing season was investigated in a study comparing continuously stocked steady‐state swards maintained at optimum height (3.5 cm) with intermittently grazed swards. The intermittent systems were designed (a) to allow periodic increase in leaf area and hence growth rate, (b)to ensure that the accumulated herbage was eaten before it senesced, and (c) lo retain high tiller density by alternating periods of herbage accumulation with periods of continuous stocking.Two treatments (no animals or animal numbers reduced to half those on the 3.5 cm steady‐state treatment) were used during the 17‐18‐d periods of herbage accumulation. Grazing down was completed in 3–4 d, after which two treatments (14 d or 28 d) were used for the intervening periods of continuous stocking when sward height was maintained at 3.5 cm.Herbage production was estimated using the tissue turnover technique, with tiller population densities and rates of growth, senescence and net production per tiller measured at frequent intervals.Intermittent grazing treatments where animals were removed during herbage accumulation resulted in changes in tiller size and number, and in growth rates, but not senescence rates, per tiller such that short‐term deviations in the net rate of herbage production occurred compared with the continuously stocked control. The periods of advantage during phases of herbage accumulation were counterbalanced by those of disadvantage during the subsequent steady‐state phases. Where animal numbers were reduced during herbage accumulation, sward conditions differed little from those of the continuously stocked control, implying that intake per individual animal was increased.It was concluded that intermittent grazing systems offered no advantage over simpler continuous stocking systems, provided that a flexible approach to conservation was incorporated to allow control of sward conditions on th