SUMMARYSpecialist training must be reshaped to meet the challenges of new systems for the delivery of health care and rapid expansion in biomedical knowledge. An adequate and affordable supply of trained specialists and generalists able to deal with the health problems of populations served, is the responsibility of governments and policymakers that fund and those who deliver graduate education. Clearly defined objectives for specialist training are needed, linked to planning for the medical workforce size. A balance between numbers of specialists and generalists is essential, although flexibility in programmes should allow individuals to change. Curricula for all specialties should be published. Strategies and methods for delivery of graduate education and training must be coherent with those of medical schools. Training should be planned and sequenced to meet the identified needs of individuals. Those who teach should themselves learn how to train and assess trainees. The location for training should reflect present and future clinical practice if disfunction between medical education and the health of populations served and their need is to be avoided. Specialist training should form the basis for continuing education by encouraging lifelong, evidence‐based learning. Any reshaping of specialist training must be consistent with the continuum of medical education. Instruments for assessment of specialists in training have to be refined, based on action research. Ensuring mastery in the competencies of each component of the curriculum is essential. Those competencies will change in consequence of altered societal needs plus advances in technology and biomedical knowledg