首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Surface chemistry evolution during molecular beam epitaxy growth of InGaAs
Surface chemistry evolution during molecular beam epitaxy growth of InGaAs

 

作者: K. R. Evans,   R. Kaspi,   J. E. Ehret,   M. Skowronski,   C. R. Jones,  

 

期刊: Journal of Vacuum Science&Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena  (AIP Available online 1995)
卷期: Volume 13, issue 4  

页码: 1820-1823

 

ISSN:1071-1023

 

年代: 1995

 

DOI:10.1116/1.587819

 

出版商: American Vacuum Society

 

关键词: QUANTUM WELLS;INDIUM ARSENIDES;GALLIUM ARSENIDES;MOLECULAR BEAM EPITAXY;INTERFACE STRUCTURE;SURFACE REACTIONS;DESORPTION;TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;TEMPERATURE RANGE 400−1000 K;(In,Ga)As

 

数据来源: AIP

 

摘要:

Temperature‐programmed desorption (TPD) measurements are carried out in a molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) growth chamber on pseudomorphic GaAs/In0.22Ga0.78As(125 Å)/GaAs single quantum wells in various stages of growth, using a line‐of‐sight mass spectrometer for quantitative desorption analysis. The presence of surface‐segregated indium is inferred from the appearance of a relatively low binding energy (Eb≊1.5 eV) peak in the indium TPD spectra. Integration of this TPD peak provides a quantitative measure of the surface‐indium population ΘIn. By incorporating the TPD experiment as a subroutine in the MBE growth program, systematic variations of growth parameters are effected and their influence on ΘInestablished. Detailed composition profiles are calculated and found to be in excellent agreement with previous results [Nagleetal., J. Cryst. Growth127, 550 (1993)]. We find that both the bottom (InGaAs on GaAs) and top (GaAs on InGaAs) interfaces are graded over as much as 10 monolayers, with the bottom interface being indium‐poor, due to the sacrificial buildup of ΘIn, and the top interface being characterized by segregation of indium into the GaAs cap, due to relatively slow incorporation of ΘIninto the lattice after closing the indium shutter. A more ‘‘squarelike’’ bottom interface is obtained by predeposition of a thin indium layer just before InGaAs growth, while a more ‘‘squarelike’’ top interface is obtained by ‘‘flash‐off’’ of ΘInjust after InGaAs growth. It is believed that the combination of predeposition plus flash‐off produces a more truly square InGaAs/GaAs quantum well than that obtained by more standard MBE growth approaches.

 

点击下载:  PDF (96KB)



返 回