For many years, it has been customary to classify catalysts as “homogeneous” or “heterogeneous.” The former commonly operate through the formation of “intermediate compounds,” and the latter, by adsorption of the reactants on the catalyst surface. The line between the two is a fine one, for the distinction between adsorption and compound formation is not at all clear, and seems to be becoming less and less clear as we learn more about adsorption. In recent years, several writers [l-7] have stressed the point that there is a good deal of overlap between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Experimental evidence supporting this point of view is accumulating, and while we are not prepared to say that there is no distinction, we can say with certainty that many homogeneous catalysts can be converted into heterogeneous ones, retaining the advantages of great activity and selectivity inherent in homogeneity and, at the same time, assuming the ready recovery which is the great advantage of heterogenity. In practice, of course, the matter is not quite that simple, for other factors must be considered. On the whole, however, many advantages have been found in the use of heterogenized homogeneous catalysts.