首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in s...
Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: Which is best?*

 

作者: Daniel De Backer,   Jacques Creteur,   Eliézer Silva,   Jean-Louis Vincent,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 2003)
卷期: Volume 31, issue 6  

页码: 1659-1667

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 2003

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: cardiac output;splanchnic blood flow;tonometry;hepatic vein oxygen saturation;adrenergic agents;lactate

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo assess the effects of different doses of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in patients with septic shock.DesignProspective, randomized, open-label study.SettingA 31-bed, medicosurgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.PatientsConvenience sample of 20 patients with septic shock, separated into two groups according to whether (moderate shock group, n = 10) or not (severe shock, n = 10) dopamine alone was able maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg.InterventionsDopamine was progressively withdrawn and replaced successively by norepinephrine and then epinephrine (the order of the two agents was randomly determined) to maintain mean arterial pressure constant (moderate shock) or to increase mean arterial pressure above 65 mm Hg (severe shock).Measurements and Main ResultsSystemic circulation (pulmonary artery catheter) and splanchnic circulation (indocyanine green dilution and hepatic vein catheter) and gastric mucosal Pco2(gas tonometry) were measured during dopamine (moderate shock only), norepinephrine, and epinephrine administration (both groups). Data were analyzed with nonparametric tests and are presented as median [percentiles 25–75]. In moderate shock, cardiac index was similar to dopamine and norepinephrine (3.1 [2.7–3.8] vs. 2.9 [2.7–4.1] L/min·m2,p= nonsignificant) but greater with epinephrine (4.1 [3.5–4.4]p< .01 vs. dopamine and norepinephrine). Splanchnic blood flow was similar with the three agents (732 [413–1483] vs. 746 [470–1401] vs. 653 [476–1832] mL/min·m,p= nonsignificant). The gradient between mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturations was lower with dopamine than with norepinephrine and epinephrine, but the Pco2gap was similar with the three agents. In severe shock, cardiac index was higher, but splanchnic blood flow was lower, with epinephrine than with norepinephrine (4.6 [3.7–5.3] vs. 3.4 [3.0–4.1] L/min·m2,p< .01 and 860 [684–1334] vs. 977 [806–1802] mL/min·m2,p< .05, respectively). Epinephrine increased the mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturation gradient but did not alter Pco2gap.ConclusionsDopamine and norepinephrine have similar hemodynamic effects, but epinephrine can impair splanchnic circulation in severe septic shock.

 

点击下载:  PDF (856KB)



返 回