ABSTRACTBackground.None of the currently used anti‐Helicobacter pyloridrug regimens cures the infection 100%, and cure results still vary considerably. The present article reviews the effectiveness of currently used antimicrobial regimens, aimed to cureH. pyloriinfection.Methods.Data collection started from the beginning of the anti‐H. pylori‐therapy era until May 1995. No attempt at formal metanalysis has been made, because many studies have been published only in abstract form. Attempts were made to exclude duplicates of studies by comparison to previously reported ones; the authors of suspected duplicates were contacted. After amalgamation of the number of included patients and the number of successfully treated patients, the mean values of eradication rates and the 95% confidence intervals were calculated.Results.A total of 237 treatment arms were analyzed. Bismuth triple therapy continues to reach high eradication rates worldwide (78–89%). Side effects leading to diminished patient compliance and the marked decline of eradication efficacy in cases of metronidazole resistance are considered to be the major drawbacks of this therapy. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dual therapy is better tolerated with fewer side effects than is bismuth triple therapy. The mean eradication rates vary from 55 to 75%, and the extremes lie between 24 and 93%. PPI triple therapies have been shown to be very effective againstH. pylori(eradication rates, 80–89%). Quadruple therapy leads to a mean eradication rate of 96%.Conclusion.Based on efficacy, PPI triple or bismuth triple therapy are recommended as first‐line treatment forH. pyloriinfection. Quadruple therapy could serve as second‐line treatment for eradication of initial failures and in case of metronidazo