Challenging Misperceptions About Nurses' Moral Reasoning
作者:
LAURA DUCKETT,
MARY ROWAN-BOYER,
MURIEL RYDEN,
PATRICIA CRISHAM,
KAY SAVIK,
JAMES REST,
期刊:
Nursing Research
(OVID Available online 1992)
卷期:
Volume 41,
issue 6
页码: 324-331
ISSN:0029-6562
年代: 1992
出版商: OVID
数据来源: OVID
摘要:
Discussions in the nursing literature about the usefulness of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning for women and nurses, and assertions about the level of moral reasoning scores of nurses have been clouded by inaccuracies and misperceptions. In this article, theoretical and measurement issues related to moral reasoning are clarified and a critical review of the literature is provided about the moral reasoning of nursing students and nurses as measured by the Defining Issues Test (DIT). The review indicates the need for greater rigor in studies of moral reasoning among nurses and the need for accuracy in interpreting and reporting moral reasoning scores. The data show that the moral reasoning of nurses, like that of other groups, tends to increase with formal education. Nurses' scores are usually comparable to, and sometimes higher than, scores of their academic peers.
点击下载:
PDF
(898KB)
返 回