首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Nutritional Efficacy and Bifidogenicity of a New I...
Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Nutritional Efficacy and Bifidogenicity of a New Infant Formula Containing Partially Hydrolyzed Protein, a High &bgr;-Palmitic Acid Level, and Nondigestible Oligosaccharides

 

作者: Hansjörg Schmelzle,   Stefan Wirth,   Heino Skopnik,   Michael Radke,   Jan Knol,   Heinz-Michael Böckler,   Anja Brönstrup,   John Wells,   Christoph Fusch,  

 

期刊: Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition  (OVID Available online 2003)
卷期: Volume 36, issue 3  

页码: 343-351

 

ISSN:0277-2116

 

年代: 2003

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Formula-feeding;Infant nutrition;Growth;Intestinal flora;Prebiotics

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional efficacy and bifidogenic characteristics of a new infant formula containing partially hydrolyzed whey protein, modified vegetable oil with a high &bgr;-palmitic acid content, prebiotic oligosaccharides, and starch.MethodsIn a double-blind study, healthy formula-fed term infants aged younger than 2 weeks were randomized to receive either the new infant formula (NF) or a standard formula (SF) until the age of 12 weeks. Anthropometric measurements were taken at enrollment, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. In a subsample of infants, blood samples were taken at 6 weeks and stool samples were taken at enrollment and 6 weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for biochemical measures of protein status and amino acids, and stools were analyzed for total bacteria and bifidobacteria. Mothers completed a feeding diary and questionnaire at 6 and 10 weeks.ResultsOne hundred fifty-four infants were enrolled in the study; 102 completed the trial. The growth of infants in both formula groups was in line with published growth curves. During the first 6 weeks, NF girls gained more weight and head circumference than the SF girls. These velocity differences were not maintained throughout the 12-week study period. The NF stools had a higher proportion of bifidobacteria at 6 weeks compared with the SF stools, and they were softer. There were no clinically significant differences in the blood biochemical and amino acid values between groups. Both formulas were well tolerated by the infants.ConclusionsWhen compared with a standard infant formula, the new formula supported satisfactory growth, led to higher counts of bifidobacteria in the feces, produced blood bio-chemical values typical of formula-fed infants, and was well tolerated.

 

点击下载:  PDF (428KB)



返 回