The Normalized DilTerence Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from NOAA's Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) has been widely used in monitoring continental and global vegetation distribution and dynamics, drought severity and location, and environmental deterioration. Since 1982, NOAA has produced the Weekly Global Vegetation Index (GVI) product from AVHRR. The analyses of the GVI product have revealed many problems due to the simplified radiometric correction involved in the processing. Those limitations have inspired several elTorts to reprocess the NOAA GVI data sets to produce an improved representation of global NDVI patterns. In this paper, the quality of three Global NDVI products resulting from very simple to rather sophisticated reprocessing was examined by using a global approach. In general, the quality of data improves with increasing sophistication of radiometric correction. However, this study reveals some significant errors common in all three products assessed. The problems include a systematic annual increase in values computed from a single satellite and jumps between consecutive satellites. These errors are large enough to alTect results of the long term time-series analyses. This pattern suggests an additional radiometric distortion in NOAA/ AVHRR data. It is found that the values computed from data of the first year after satellite launch are roughly the same statistically for NOAA satellites. Thus, the discontinuity ofNDVls between satellites appears to be mainly caused by the systematic drift. Therefore, data collected in the first year of satellite launch might be considered as a baseline for correcting the systematic errors. By comparing NDVI from the first year of satellites in space, it is also found that NDVI increases at higher latitude and decreases or keeps constant at lower latitude. This change of NDVI with time might signal the change of global climate.