首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation for Inoperable Carcinoma of the Maxillary Antrum...
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation for Inoperable Carcinoma of the Maxillary AntrumA Matched-Control Study

 

作者: Gwi Kim,   Sei Chang,   Sang Lee,   Hong Pyo,   Eun Choi,   Jae Roh,   Ki Keum,   Chang Lee,   Chang Suh,  

 

期刊: American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials  (OVID Available online 2000)
卷期: Volume 23, issue 3  

页码: 301-308

 

ISSN:0277-3732

 

年代: 2000

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;Radiotherapy;Maxillary cancer, inoperable.

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

A matched-control study comparing standard radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation was undertaken to clarify the effects of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. Thirty-four patients with inoperable maxillary cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (Group II). Before starting radiotherapy, all patients in Group II received two or three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil with or without intravenous injection of vinblastine. Radiation doses ranged from 66 Gy to 75 Gy (median, 70 Gy). The response rate, patterns of failure, toxicity, and survival for Group II were compared with those for 34 stage-matched patients treated with radiation alone (Group I). Despite a higher response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the recurrence rate and patterns of treatment failure were not influenced by the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In most cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not interfere with subsequent radiotherapy, and radiation-induced late complications occurred equally in both treatment groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, there was no significant difference in 5-year actuarial survival or disease-free survival between the two treatment groups. Radiation alone for inoperable maxillary cancer was clearly suboptimal for improving local control and survival rate, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy in addition to standard radiotherapy failed to demonstrate any therapeutic advantage over radiation alone.

 



返 回