Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty: The Liberal and Republican Versions*
作者:
JÜRGEN HABERMAS,
期刊:
Ratio Juris
(WILEY Available online 1994)
卷期:
Volume 7,
issue 1
页码: 1-13
ISSN:0952-1917
年代: 1994
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1994.tb00162.x
出版商: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
数据来源: WILEY
摘要:
AbstractPopular sovereignty and human rights are the modern pillars of legal legitimacy and political power. Liberal and republican thought, however, tend to interpret the two notions from different perspectives: either as moral principles, emphasizing the self‐legislation and autonomy of individuals, or as ethical values, stressing the self‐realization of the political community. Adhering to his theory of communicative action, the author brings the two principles together in a non‐competitive relation. Here the connection between popular sovereignty and human rights is given by the procedures of a discursive process of opinion‐ and will‐formation. Theoretically, the institutionalization of this process through law leads to a normative model of contemporary democracy, which is based on the substance of human rights as a formal condition for deliberative p
点击下载:
PDF
(890KB)
返 回