The recent increase of activity in the field of slow‐electron diffraction has resulted in a need for agreement on conventions of terminology in the description of a diperiodicsurface structurerelative to a triperiodicsubstrate. Vector description of the surface structurenetin terms of the substrate surface net is suggested. Fractional Miller indices result when the surface structuremeshis larger than the substrate surface mesh. The surface structure may be either that of a deposit or that of theselvedgeof the substrate.With the relaxation of one of the diffraction conditions in the diperiodic structure the reciprocal lattice becomes a set of parallel rods intersecting the Ewald sphere continuously with change of wavelength of the incident radiation or change of orientation of the crystal.The paper discusses the applicability of the seventeen two‐dimensional space groups and the eighty diperiodic groups in three dimensions to these diperiodic structures. A comparison is made between the different effects of surface symmetry on etch pits and epitaxial deposits on the cleavage face of muscovite.