AbstractAn effort is made to identify groups of advocates and opponents of the notion that all doctors ought to be put on salary. Three major findings result from the analysis: respondents who are concerned either with cost reduction or equalisation of access to medical service favour fixed remuneration of all doctors: people who favour the remuneration by salary of all doctors appear to be spokesmen for others rather than advocates of their own cause; political party preference is the most important causal factor in determining the support for such a policy. Overall, two out of five respondents endorse the notion of fixed compensation of all doctors but neither political party is able to muster a clear majority for such a proposition suggesting that the present fee‐for‐service arrangement will not be changed in the foreseeable fut