首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Randomized trial of the use of heliox as a driving gas for updraft nebulization of bron...
Randomized trial of the use of heliox as a driving gas for updraft nebulization of bronchodilators in the emergent treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

 

作者: Bennett,   deBoisblanc Peter,   DeBleiux Scott,   Resweber Evan,   Fusco Warren,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 2000)
卷期: Volume 28, issue 9  

页码: 3177-3180

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 2000

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: ipratropium bromide;albuterol;pulmonary function tests;helium;emergency department

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

ObjectiveTo determine whether the bronchodilator effects of albuterol and ipratropium bromide are greater if updraft nebulization is driven by 80% helium and 20% oxygen (HELIOX) than if driven by compressed room air (AIR) during the treatment of an acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).SettingThe emergency department of a 750-bed inner-city community hospital.MethodsOver a 12-month period, a convenience sample of 50 normoxic patients presenting with signs and symptoms of an acute exacerbation of COPD were prospectively randomized to receive either HELIOX or AIR as the driving gas for updraft nebulization of a mixture of albuterol 2.5 mg and ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg. Additional aerosol treatments with albuterol 2.5 mg were given at 20, 40, and 120 mins after randomization using the assigned gas. Spirometry was obtained while breathing room air before the first treatment (baseline) and at 1 hr and 2 hrs after the initiation of treatment. The primary measure of efficacy was the change in percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (Fev1) over the treatment period. A secondary measure of efficacy was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory flow after 25% to 75% of vital capacity had been expelled (Fef25–75).ResultsTwenty-five patients were randomized to each treatment group. Three patients (1 HELIOX, 2 AIR) were unable to complete the study. The baseline Fev1was 44% (95% confidence interval, 35% to 52%) of predicted in the HELIOX group and 39 (31% to 46%) of predicted in the AIR group. There were no adverse outcomes observed in either the HELIOX group or the AIR group. There were no significant differences in the change of Fev1between the two groups by either the 1 hr or 2 hr time point (1 hr, HELIOX + 10% [7% to 13%], AIR + 9% [5% to 13%]; 2 hr HELIOX + 10% [6% to 15%], AIR + 10% [6% to 14%]). The improvement in Fef25–75was significantly greater in the HELIOX group than in the AIR group at both the 1 hr time point (HELIOX + 14% [7% to 22%] vs. AIR + 7% [3% to 10%],p= .05) and at the 2 hr time point (HELIOX + 15% [8% to 21%] vs. AIR + 7% [4% to 11%],p= .05).ConclusionUse of HELIOX as a driving gas for the updraft nebulization of bronchodilators during the first 2 hrs of treatment of an acute COPD exacerbation failed to improve Fev1faster than the use of AIR. The faster improvement in Fef25–75during the first 2 hrs of treatment was small and of uncertain clinical significance.

 

点击下载:  PDF (121KB)



返 回