首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Nicotine DeliveryA Review and Comparison to Other Ni...
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Nasal Nicotine DeliveryA Review and Comparison to Other Nicotine Systems

 

作者: Nina G. Schneider,   Erik Lunell,   Richard E. Olmstead,   Karl-Olov Fagerström,  

 

期刊: Clinical Pharmacokinetics  (ADIS Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 31, issue 1  

页码: 65-80

 

ISSN:0312-5963

 

年代: 1996

 

出版商: ADIS

 

数据来源: ADIS

 

摘要:

Rapid drug delivery (arterial ‘boli’) and high drug concentrations occur with nicotine inhaled in smoke. These are believed to be key elements in producing addiction to cigarettes. Preparations which reduce the rate of delivery and/or concentration of nicotine have been introduced as treatments for smoking cessation.These nicotine medications work by relieving withdrawal and preventing relapse associated with abrupt cessation of smoking. The pharmacokinetics of each system are expected to affect efficacy and treatment dependence. Nasal administration systems have been developed to more closely approximate cigarette delivery for improved efficacy in clinical application and for more control in systematic testing of nicotine. With laboratory tested nasal application systems (clinical drug and experimental devices), venous plasma concentrations after a single dose range between 5 and 12 μg/L.Higher steady-state blood nicotine concentrations (16 to 29 μg/L) have been reported forad libitumclinical self-administration with a nicotine nasal spray. Time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) with nasal administration is around 11 to 13 minutes for 1mg doses. This rise time is slower than for cigarette delivery but faster than the other nicotine treatments. Venous plasma concentrations are considerably lower than tobacco product concentrations and fall within the range of the lower dose nicotine treatments (e.g. 2mg gumvs4mg gum).The profile of nasal nicotine administration was designed for certain subsets of smokers. Efficacy trials show consistent superiority of nasal administration over placebo although the comparative efficacy among nicotine treatments remains to be determined. The more rapid onset and user control of nasal nicotine may impose a higher risk for treatment dependence compared with a slower, passive system such as the patch. It may not produce more dependence than other faster-acting treatment systems (e.g. nicotine gum).

 

点击下载:  PDF (7493KB)



返 回