首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 The persistence of hydrogen peroxide in milk
The persistence of hydrogen peroxide in milk

 

作者: E. Hinks,  

 

期刊: Analyst  (RSC Available online 1915)
卷期: Volume 40, issue 477  

页码: 482-491

 

ISSN:0003-2654

 

年代: 1915

 

DOI:10.1039/AN9154000482

 

出版商: RSC

 

数据来源: RSC

 

摘要:

482 HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK. BY E. HINKS, F.I.C. (Read at the Neeting, November 3, 1915.) CONSIDERABLE attention has, during recent years, been given to the determination of the catalytic activity of milk, and to the question of the usefulness of such deter- mination for the purposes of milk control, Various methods have been proposed, and are in use, for effecting this determination.Faitelowitz (ANALYST, 1910, 35, 526) shows that while the catalase of milk destroys hydrogen peroxide, the peroxide at the same time destroys the catalase, and consequently the rate of destruction of peroxide is not necessarily a measure of the amount of catalase. If the concentration of the peroxide is high, the destruction of catalase has a considerable influence upon the rate of destruction of peroxide, and a measure of the amount of catalase present can be obtained only by continued additions of small quantities of peroxide and observing the rate of destruction of the peroxide under these conditions.I n this communication, when a figure for catalytic activity is given, this has been determined by Koniag’s iodimetric method as used by Revis (ANALYST, 1910, 35, 359), and is numerically the number of C.C.of FT Thiosulphate corresponding to the peroxide destroyed by the catalytic activity of 100 C.C. of the milk in two hours at 37’ C. In this method the concentration of the peroxide used is high. The following experiments, in which the persistence of hydrogen peroxide has been studied, have a bearing both upon the determination of catalytic activity and upon the detection of peroxide in milk.The length of time during which hydrogen peroxide at various concentrations persisted in different milks was first studied. Known quantities of peroxide were added to milk which was then allowed to stand at laboratory temperature, and the peroxide present at stated intervals was estimated iodimetricalIy, the procedure following that used in Koning’s method for the catalytic activity determination (Zoc.cit.). Owing to occlusion of iodine by the casein the precise end-point of the titra- tion is difficult to determine, and although the results of analysis are given to the third place of decimals this third place is hardly a significant figure.It was found that the peroxide was destroyed rapidly at first, that the rate of destruction diminished, and that if the concentration of peroxide was highHINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK 483 Per Cent. Per Cent. Peroxide added ... 0.200 0.197 After 1 hour 0-158 0.146 ,, 1 day ... 0.100 0.100 ,, 2 days ... 0.076 0.110 9 , 3 9 , ... 0.097 0*107 9 , 4 9 9 ...0.097 - 9 , 6 9 ) ... - 0.103 99 3, ... 0-092 0.103 9, 9 9 9 ... 0-090 - ,, 11 3, ... 0.090 0.101 >, 13 9 , ... 0.090 - ,, 3 weeks ... 0.087 0.099 $9 4 9 9 ... 0.092 0.098 ¶, 5 9 , ... 0.086 0.096 Peroxide present- ... enough to withstand the first rapid destruction, the residual peroxide remained constant in amount over long periods. The following example as typical of the results that were obtained may be given.I n this case the peroxide concentration was high : Per Cent. Per Cent. Peroxide present- After 6 weeks ... 0.087 0.102 9 ) 7 ?, ... 0.087 0*101 ,, 8 ,, ... 0.090 0.104 ,, 9 ,, ... 0.091 0.100 ,) 11 ,, 0.091 0.102 ,) 13 ,, ... 0.091 0.102 ,, 15 ,, ... 0.088 0.098 ,, 17 ,) ... 0.096 0.101 ,, 23 ,, ... 0-082 0.092 ,, 30 ), ...0.081 0.088 ,, 39 ,, ... 0.079 0.084 ,, 56 ,, ... 0.066 0-081 ,, 67 ,, ... 0.073 0.089 ,, 87 ,, ... 0.070 0.087 ... MILK I. Peroxide added, 0.5 per Cent. Peroxide Present. ... ... ... 0.37 per cent. ... ... ... 0.21 ,, ... ... ... 0.20 ,, . ... ... ... 0.185 ,) ... ... ... 0.183 ,, ... ... ... 0.181 ,, ... ... 0.182 ,) ... ... ... 0-182 )) ...484 HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK I t wiIl be seen that in this milk, though the initial concentration of peroxide was only 0.2 per cent., peroxide was still present in comparatively large amounts after a very considerable length of time in portions A and B: at the end of one year upwards of 33 per cent. of the peroxide added was still present.The influence of the age and condition of milk upon the persistence of peroxide added to it is markedly shown in this experiment.The portions A and C had cata- lytic activities of 32 and 158 respectively. Neglecting the differences introduced by the different concentrations of peroxide used in the experiment and in the catalytic activity determination, and also the influence of temperature, calculation from the catalytic activity figures shows that A would reduce the peroxide concentration by 0.05 per cent.and C would reduce it by 0.27 per cent. (absolute) in two hours. In A and B the peroxide concentration was high enough to stand this first rapid action by catalase : in C it was not. As a result, whilst the peroxide persisted in A and B for more than eighteen months, and was still present at the time of writing, in the case Qf C none remained after one hour, though A, B, and C were actually all portions of the same milk, and the initial concentrations of the peroxide were approximately Unqualified statements to the effect that any given quantity of peroxide will or will not persist for a given time, and can or cannot be detected after a given time, are, though frequently met with, valueless.* As is to be expected from the known equal.MILK VI. Catalytic Activity, 39. Peroxide added, 0-1 95 per Cent. Peroxide present. Portion kept at- 17" C. -- 0.170 0.082 0.052 0.035 0.032 0.030 0.020 3-015 none - 27" C. 0.165 0.104 0.103 0-105 0.111 0.1 11 0-111 0.038 none - 37" c. 0.143 0.113 0.113 0.113 0.116 0.116 0.114 0.116 0.119 - Ortol Reaction. 17" C. Alone.+ + + + faint faint - With fresh milk. + + + + + + Portion kept st- 27" C. ~ With fresh milk. + + + + + + 37" c. With fresh milk. + + + + + + * From the results of those experiments that mere performed with perfectly fresh milk, it would appear that it would be unusual if 0.1 per cent. of peroxide were to persist for twenty-four hours even if added to the milk immediately after being drawn, strained, and cooled.HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IK MILK 485 0.044 MILK IV.Catalytic Activity, 61. Peroxide added, 0.19 per Cent. 0.024 Peroxide present . . . Reactiorzs- (a) Milk alone 1:: I P” 0-082 (b) With peroxide added 0.071 (c) With fresh milk added {i Portion kept at 15’ C. after- 10 Mins. 0.148 Hours. 1 1 Day. -..--- I- 3 Days. 0.015 + trace + + trace + + + 4 bays. 0.008 + trace + + inc’d + + + 6 Days, 0.004 - - - trace - - - trace - 8 Days. none - - - trace - - - - - Portion kept at 27” C.after- 10 Mins. 11 Days. none Peroxide present . . . Reactions - i 0 i! (a) Milk alone ( b ) With peroxidej LO IP added ( c ) With fresh {: milk added 0.139 6 Hours. I 1 Day. I 3 Days, 0-070 faint - - faint faint - + + + 4 Days 0.070 - - - - faint -.+ + + 6 Days 0.066 - faint - - faint - + + + 8 Days, 0.065 trace trace trace trace + + + - - rise that takes place in the catalytic activity of milk on keeping, a most important factor in the behaviour of milk towards hydrogen peroxide is its age. I t will be shown later, in connection with the peroxidase reactions, that if the milk has not been heated it is sometimes possible to infer that hydrogen peroxide has been added, though at the time of testing it is not present.Peroxide was added in known quantities to milk, portions of which had been brought to, and were subsequently kept at, different temperatures. The results of several such experiments are given in the tables, the quantities of peroxide remaining in the various portions being estimated after the intervals stated.The influence of temperature was then studied. * For an explanation of these letters see p. 487, under “The Peroxidase Reactions.”486 HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK 10 Mins. 0.150 Within the range of temperatures studied, the effect of a rise of temperature is to lengthen the time during which the peroxide persists.I t is to be noted, however, that during the first few minutes the rate at which peroxide was destroyed was greater at the higher temperature. Thus in ten minutes in all cases more peroxide had been destroyed in the portions kept at the higher temperatures, but at the end of six hours this condition had been reversed. I t might be expected that, at any rate up to 3 7 O C., the higher the temperature the greater would be the catalytic activity, and the results obtained at the end of ten minutes indicate that this is so, The ultimate result, however, must be due to a resultant of destructive effects of the catalase on the peroxide and of the MILK 111.Catalytic Activity, 70. Peroxide added, 0.196 per Cent. _. - __ . .- __ ._ - - - - - 6 Hours. 1 Day.2 Days. 3 Days, 0.070 0.053 0.046 0.050 ----- trace I 1- 10 Mins Peroxide present.. . Raac tions- ... I 0.162 ( a ) Milk alone { b ) W i t h peroxide added ... (c) With fresh milk added ... ... I + + + Portion kept at 15" C. after- trace + + + ! I i Hours 0.055 1 Day. 0.015 + + + 6 Days, ' 7 Days. none - - - f + + Peroxide present . . . React ions- I0 (a) Milk alone B I p (b) With per- oxideadded ( c ) R7ith fresh milk added {i Port,ion kept at 27" C.after- I 4 Days. 1 6 Days. I 7 Days. I - I-' 0-042 ' 0.034 I 0-008 - 9 faint 1 faint I i - + / + I + ' + I - I - - - + J + I - l 9 Days. noneHINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK 487 MILK V. Catalytic Activity, 132. Peroxide added, 0.10 per Cent. ! Portion kept at 14" C. after- I- I I 10 Mins. I_- I _ _- Peroxide present .. . Reactions- (a) Milk alone B -I: ( b ) With peroxide{! added ( c ) With fresh fg milk added Ip 0.076 3 Hours 0.003 Portion kept at 27" C. after- LO Mins 0-065 6 Hours. 0.006 1 Day. peroxide on the catalase. If the latter action is enhanced by a rise of temperature to an extent equal to or greater than the former, then there would be, at an elevated temperature, at first a more rapid destruction of peroxide, due to increased cata- lytic activity, followed by a less rapid destruction, due to disappearance of catalase.If this be the correct explanation of the results obtained, it would follow that in a method for the determination of the catalytic activity in which an excess of peroxide is employed for a period of some hours, an elevated temperature would be likely to result in a lower figure being obtained.The reverse would occur if the catalytic activity were high enough to reduce quickly the effective concentration of the peroxide.* The Pdroxidase Reactions. Orthomethylaminophenol sulphate ('( ortol "), benzidine, and paraphenylene- diamine have been used for the detection of hydrogen peroxide in milk.They are also used for the detection of previous heating of milk. The reactions of these reagents with the milk to which peroxide had been added were accordingly observed during the course of these experiments, the reactions being noted as positive or negative against the letters 0, B, and P in the tables, these letters denoting the reagents in the order named above.The reactions depend upon the simultaneous presence in the milk of hydrogen peroxide and a peroxidase. As in the case of catalase, hydrogen peroxide destroys peroxidase, and a negative reaction may consequently be due not to the absence of peroxide, but to the absence of peroxidase, which has been caused either by previous heating of the milk or by the peroxide which is being tested for, The reaction8 were * In a few cases the catalytic activity figure was determined at two temperatures.In only one case did an elevated temperature result in a higher figure, and this was a case in which the catalytic activity was somewhat high.488 HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK therefore tried with the milk under examination (a) alone, (b) with a fresh addition of peroxide, (c) with the addition of fresh milk; (b) and ( c ) being applied only when a negative reaction was obtained with (a).C. H. La Wall (ANALYST, 1909, 34, 160) found that the reaction with benzidine disappeared at an earlier stage, after addition of peroxide, than that with para- phenylenediarnine, and concluded that different enzymes were involved in the two cases.The present experiments do not confirm this. The ben- zidine reaction is extremely brilliant and sensitive, but is much affected by the conditions under which the test is performed. Strong positive reactions are obtained only when the peroxide is carefully added and not intimately mixed with the milk, the best condition being that in which the peroxide is floated on to the surface of the milk and allowed to diffuse.In the case of a milk which already contains per- oxide this condition is unattainable, and the brilliancy and certainty of the reaction are much diminished. The ortol reaction is adversely affected by the presence of excess of peroxide, and is, perhaps, rather less sensitive to a very small amount of peroxidase ; the paraphenylenediamine reaction is not affected by a considerable excess of peroxide, and is, on the whole, probably the most generally applicable of the three.Numerous trials, in addition to those detailed above, were made with different concentrations o€ peroxide, and no evidence was obtained that the reactions are due to different enzymes, due allowance being made for the susceptibility of the reagents, especially benzidine, to the coditions existing.It may be here observed that with colour reactions of this nature, in which time is also a factor, distinct positives and distinct negatives form sharp contrasts, but as the peroxide or per- oxidase disappears, there comes a time when it is doubtful whether the reaction should be classed as positive or negative. That a negative reaction may be due to the absence of peroxide or of peroxidase or of both may be seen from the tables.For instance, in the case of Milk IV., in the portion kept at 27" C., the reactions with the milk alone at from four to eleven days were all negative or nearly so, although approximately 0.07 per cent. of peroxide was present ; with fresh milk added the reactions were all positive ; the peroxidase had thus been destroyed, while the peroxide persisted.I n the portion kept a t 15" C., at four days there was little peroxids left, but sufficient peroxide and peroxidase to give the reactions ; at later periods the reactions were all negative, with the exception of a few doubtful ones, with milk alone, with fresh peroxide added, and with fresh milk added, showing that the peroxide and the peroxidase had both disappeared.I n the c a ~ e of Milk III., at the end of four days the portion kept at 15' C. the peroxide had disappeared, and consequently negative reactions were obtained with the milk alone and with fresh milk added ; positive reactions were given with fresh peroxide, however, showing that the peroxidase had not disappeared.In the portion kept at 27" C. the exact reverse had occurred, the peroxide being still present and the peroxidase having disappeared. In Milk V., which had received a small original addition of peroxide, after one day the portion kept at 14' C. contained peroxidase but no peroxide; that kept at 27' C. contained neither. These three reagents are not equaHy applicable in all circumstances.HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HSDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK 489 Owing to this destruction of peroxidase by peroxide it is thus necessary, when testing for the presence of the latter, to add some fresh milk as well as the reagent used, in order to insure the presence of peroxidase.Also, although peroxide may not be actually present, it may at times be inferred that it had at one time been present, provided that the milk had not been previously heated.This possibility of the milk having been previously heated must always be considered in relation to these tests for peroxide, though the addition of fresh milk will be effective in such a case. Conversely, the possibility of the milk having received an addition of poroxide must be considered when these reactions are used for the detection of previous heating, since a, “peroxidised” and n heated milk will, in certain circumstances, react in exactly the same manner.DISCUSSION. THE PRESIDENT remarked that under even the best conditions the study of enzyme action was beset by many difficulties, and Mr. Rinks was to be congratul- ated on having, in face of such complications as were met with in the case of milk, approached so nearly to a, definite conclusion.Mr. C. REVIS said that the fact of the persistence of hydrogen peroxide was well known to those concerned with the practical handling of milk, I t was, indeed, one of the almost insurmountable difficulties connected with certain processes for sterilising milk with hydrogen peroxide. When such processes first came into use, it was considered that it would be quite easy to add sufficient hydrogen peroxide to destroy all the organisms, and that the hydrogen peroxide would not persist, but would itself be destroyed by the organisms or by the organic matter, leaving a sterile liquid, in which there would be no injurious substance left, I t was found, however, that if hydrogen peroxide was added in sufficient quantity to bring about sterilisa- tion, a pronounced taste was produced in the milk, and the addition of some cata- lase, which would destroy the hydrogen peroxide after sterilisation had taken place, was found to be necessary.He was pleased to find that Mr. Hinks had used Koning’s method of measuring catalytic activity. I t was an excellent method, but, judging from the literature, apart from the original author, Mr.Hinks and he were the only two workers who had used it. The gasometric method was exceedingly difficult to obtain good results with. Dr. Harden and Miss Lane-Claypon had used it in their experiments in the best possible manner. In Koning’s process there certainly was some occlusion of iodine by the casein, but if the experiments were carried out in a, comparative manner, with the necessary precautions, the results were excellent.It was important, in an investigation of this kind, that the milk used should be, as in some of Mr. Hinks’s experiments, obtained direct from the COW, because the catalase, or peroxydase, or whatever it was that destroyed the peroxide, did not arise from one source alone. According to some authorities, these destructors of peroxide were present in milk in the udder, this conclusion being based on the fact that freshly drawn milk was in many cases capable of destroying hydrogen peroxide.Thie, however, did not necessarily mean that the milk in itself contained catalase. Grimmer had made glycerol extracts of mammary tissue, and490 HINKS: THE PERSISTENCE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN MILK had found these to have a strong catalytic activity.There was no doubt that the cellular elements which were present in milk always had a strong catalytic activity, and he had recently obtained evidence that these cellular elements might be actually dissolved in the milk itself whilst in the udder. Unfortunately, however, the bacteria occurring in milk also produced a good deal of catalase, and it was these multiple sources of catalase which complicated all experiments.If both natural catalase and bacteria were present, the result all depended upon the quantity of peroxide added and the temperature employed. If so much peroxide were added that all bacteria were destroyed, then natural catalase alone came into action, and if it were destroyed before the peroxide was completely used up, then peroxide remained. If bacteria were not destroyed, the excess peroxide was gradually de- stroyed as bacterial catalase developed.The course of the action was also greatly modified by the type of bacterial development which took place. I n Mr. Hinks’s three cases the partial destruction of peroxide occurring in experi- ment ‘(A’’ would be due to the catalase of the milk, and so also in experiment B,” since in theinterval of twenty-four hours there would be but a slight multiplication of bacteria, but in experiment C ” the bacteria would have multiplied enormously, producing sufficient catalase to complete the destruction of the peroxide immediately.Mr. W. PARTRIDGE remarked that neither Mr.Rinks nor Mr. Revis had men- tioned whether, as a matter of fact, hydrogen peroxide was used at all for preserva- five purposes. Its use under certain restrictions was provided for in the Milk and Cream Regulations, but he had never found it in milk or cream or seen any cream labelled as containing it. Mr. Hinks’s experiments might perhaps be the means of removing an injustice hitherto suffered by certain oxidising disinfectants, the action of which was supposed to be due to organic peroxides.From the fact that such disinfectants were found to have as strong an action after being left in contact with organic matter as before, it used to be assumed that there wag no peroxide present ; but Mr. Hinks’s experiments clearly showed that peroxide could exist and remain in presence of organic matter. Mr.REVIS said that hydrogen peroxide was never used for preserving milk. The PRESIDENT thought it probable that the increase in catalytic activity which occurred after a few days’ rest was due to bacterial growth. With regard to the question of the presence of catalase in milk as drawn from the udder, he did not Bee any reason why it should not occur in solution, apart from any cellular elements, as in preserved yeast prepared by Buchner’s method, where there was not any question of cellular dements.In the experiments with Milk V. and Milk VI., of which the catalytic activity was 132 and 39 respectively, he should have expected a consider- able difference in the quantity of hydrogen peroxide destroyed during the first ten minutes.I t was, however, approximately the same in both cases, which seemed curious. Mr. RINKS said that generally speaking one would expect the destruction of peroxide to correspond to the catalytic activity, but there were many disturbing influences, though as a rule these followed very much the same course. Milk V. was certainlynot very fresh. Mr. Revis had mentioned that hydrogen peroxide was never used in milk, but attempts had been made to use it. There was a great differ-FORMIC ACID AS A REAGENT IN ESSENTIAL OIL ANALYSIS 491 ence as regards persistence between 0.1 and 0-2 per cent. No unqualified statement could be made as to how long it would last, but he should think that probably, even with perfectly fresh milk, 0.1 per cent. would not last twenty-four hours, while 0-2 per cent. would probably last for a long time. Koning’s method, of course, did not measure the actual quantity of catalase present or the actual catalytic activity, but merely yielded an empirical figure. This would vary if the temperature or the time were altered, but when obtained under the same conditions it was very useful for com- paring different samples of milk. As to whether catalase did or did not exist in milk drawn under sterile conditions he was not prepared to speak positively; but when a sample taken immediately after milking showed a, figure of 32, and when this only rose to 34 after forty-eight hours, and then rose rapidly, it would seem reasonable to suppose that the catalase was there to start with.

 

点击下载:  PDF (720KB)



返 回