首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Cerebral resuscitation from cardiac arrestTreatment potentials
Cerebral resuscitation from cardiac arrestTreatment potentials

 

作者: Sven-Eric MD Gisvold,   Fritz MD Sterz,   Norman S. MD Abramson,   Gad MD Bar-Joseph,   Uwe MD Ebmeyer,   Hendrik MD Gervais,   Myron MD Ginsberg,   Laurence M. MD Katz,   Patrick M. MD Kochanek,   Kazutoshi MD Kuboyama,   Brian PhD Miller,   Walter PhD Obrist,   Risto O. MD Roine,   Peter MD Safar,   Kah Ming MD Sim,   Karol MD Vandevelde,   Robert J. MD White,   Feng MD Xiao,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1996)
卷期: Volume 24, issue 2  

页码: 69-80

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1996

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

In 1961, in Pittsburgh, PA, ``cerebral'' was added to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation system (CPR right arrow CPCR).Cerebral recovery is dependent on arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation times, and numerous factors related to basic, advanced, and prolonged life support. Postischemic-anoxic encephalopathy (the cerebral postresuscitation disease or syndrome) is complex and multifactorial. The prevention or mitigation of this syndrome requires that there be development and trials of special, multifaceted, combination treatments. The selection of therapies to mitigate the postresuscitation syndrome should continue to be based on mechanistic rationale. Therapy based on a single mechanism, however, is unlikely to be maximally effective. For logistic reasons, the limit for neurologic recovery after 5 mins of arrest must be extended to achieve functionally and histologically normal human brains after 10 to 20 mins of circulatory arrest. This goal has been approached, but not quite reached. Treatment effects on process variables give clues, but long-term outcome evaluation is needed for documentation of efficacy and to improve clinical results. Goals have crystallized for clinically relevant cardiac arrest-intensive care outcome models in large animals. These studies are expensive, but essential, because positive treatment effects cannot always be confirmed in the rat forebrain ischemia model. Except for a still-elusive breakthrough effect, randomized clinical trials of CPCR are limited in their ability to statistically document the effectiveness of treatments found to be beneficial in controlled outcome models in large animals. Clinical studies of feasibility, side effects, and acceptability are essential. Hypertensive reperfusion overcomes multifocal no-reflow and improves outcome. Physical combination treatments, such as mild resuscitative (early postarrest) hypothermia (34 degrees C) plus cerebral blood flow promotion (e.g., with hypertension, hemodilution, and normocapnia), each having multiple beneficial effects, achieved complete functional and near-complete histologic recovery of the dog brain after 11 mins of normothermic, ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Calcium entry blockers appear promising as a treatment for postischemic-anoxic encephalopathy. However, the majority of single or multiple drug treatments explored so far have failed to improve neurologic outcome. Assembling and evaluating combination treatments in further animal studies and determining clinical feasibility inside and outside hospitals are challenges for the near future. Treatments without permanent beneficial effects may at least extend the therapeutic window. All of these investigations will require coordinated efforts by multiple research groups, pursuing systematic, multilevel research--from cell cultures to rats, to large animals, and to clinical trials. There are still many gaps in our knowledge about optimizing extracerebral life support for cerebral outcome.(Crit Care Med 1996; 24(Suppl):S69-S80)

 



返 回