首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Antihistamine prophylaxis permits rapid vancomycin infusion
Antihistamine prophylaxis permits rapid vancomycin infusion

 

作者: Cheryl Renz,   John Thurn,   Henry Finn,   James Lynch,   Jonathan Moss,  

 

期刊: Critical Care Medicine  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 27, issue 9  

页码: 1732-1737

 

ISSN:0090-3493

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: anaphylactoid;anaphylaxis;antihistamines;histamine;joint arthroplasty;methicillin-resistant staphylococci;redman syndrome;sepsis;vancomycin

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Objective:To determine whether pretreatment with intravenous antihistamines attenuates the symptoms of red-man syndrome associated with rapid vancomycin administration.Design:Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of patients undergoing elective arthroplasty.Setting:Preoperative unit in a tertiary care center.Patients:Forty preoperative patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, receiving vancomycin prophylaxis for elective prosthetic joint replacement or revision.Interventions:Elective orthopedic patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous antihistamines (diphenhydramine, 1 mg/kg, and cimetidine, 4 mg/kg) or placebo before rapid vancomycin infusion (1 g over 10 mins). Hemodynamic measurements, symptoms of histamine release, and plasma histamine levels were obtained in each patient during vancomycin administration. Rapid vancomycin infusion was discontinued in cases of decreases in mean blood pressure of ≥20% or intolerable itching.Measurements and Main Results:Clinical symptomatology of red-man syndrome and histamine levels were assessed using Fisher's exact test or Student'st-test. Comparison of baseline and peak histamine levels for both the treated (mean ± SD, 0.2 ± 0.2 vs. 4.7 ± 2.4 mg/mL;p< .0001) and placebo patients (mean ± SD, 0.2 ± 0.1 vs. 3.5 ± 3.4 ng/mL;p= .0002) was statistically significant. Although there was a significant increase in plasma histamine levels during vancomycin infusion, it did not differ between the treatment groups. Only two (11%) of the treated patients developed hypotension, vs. 12 (63%) of the placebo patients (p= .002). Rash was partially attenuated. Twelve (63%) of the treated patients developed rash, compared with 19 (100%) of the placebo patients (p= .008). The rapid infusion was discontinued in two (11%) of the treated patients, compared with 11 (58%) of the placebo patients (p= .005). Four treated patients had no symptoms of histamine release.Conclusions:Pretreatment with intravenous H1and H2antihistamines permitted rapid vancomycin administration in 89% of treated patients. Although protection was incomplete, rash did not predict a need to stop the rapid infusion of vancomycin in our patients.

 



返 回