首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Comparative Study of Four Evaluation Criteria in a Clinical Trial with Schizophrenic Pa...
Comparative Study of Four Evaluation Criteria in a Clinical Trial with Schizophrenic Patients

 

作者: E. Fombonne,   P. Peron-Magnan,   R. Fuhrer,   P. Simon,  

 

期刊: Neuropsychobiology  (Karger Available online 1986)
卷期: Volume 16, issue 4  

页码: 186-192

 

ISSN:0302-282X

 

年代: 1986

 

DOI:10.1159/000118324

 

出版商: S. Karger AG

 

关键词: Concordance of evaluation criteria;Psychiatric rating scale;Treatment evaluation;Schizophrenic patients;Clinical judgement

 

数据来源: Karger

 

摘要:

In order to compare the level of agreement between four evaluation criteria, data from an 18-month clinical trial with 181 schizophrenic patients were reanalyzed. In that study, assessments of the subjects were carried out with two psychiatric rating scales, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Nurses’ Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (BPRS and NOSIE), and two clinical evaluations (psychiatrist and nurse). Results show that there was total agreement on the four outcome measures for only half of the subjects. After further analyses, we observed that the best agreement was between the two clinical assessments. The NOSIE had poor agreement with the other criteria and appeared less sensitive to moderate levels of improvement in the patients’ clinical status. These results are discussed with respect to reliability and validity iss

 

点击下载:  PDF (1376KB)



返 回