首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 Awareness during AnesthesiaA Closed Claims Analysis
Awareness during AnesthesiaA Closed Claims Analysis

 

作者: Karen Domino,   Karen Posner,   Robert Caplan,   Frederick Cheney,  

 

期刊: Anesthesiology  (OVID Available online 1999)
卷期: Volume 90, issue 4  

页码: 1053-1061

 

ISSN:0003-3022

 

年代: 1999

 

出版商: OVID

 

关键词: Complications;consciousness;injuries;medicolegal;memory.

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

BackgroundAwareness during general anesthesia is a frightening experience, which may result in serious emotional injury and post‐traumatic stress disorder. We performed an in‐depth analysis of cases from the database of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project to explore the contribution of intraoperative awareness to professional liability in anesthesia.MethodsThe database of the Closed Claims Project is composed of closed US malpractice claims that have been collected in a standardized manner. All claims for intraoperative awareness were reviewed by the reviewers to identify patterns of causation and standard of care. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent patient and anesthetic factors associated with claims for recall during general anesthesia compared to other general anesthesia malpractice claims.ResultsAwareness claims accounted for 79 (1.9%) of 4,183 claims in the database, including 18 claims for awake paralysis, i.e., the inadvertent paralysis of an awake patient, and 61 claims for recall during general anesthesia, i.e., recall of events while receiving general anesthesia. The majority of awareness claims involved women (77%), younger than 60 yr of age (89%), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I‐II (68%), who underwent elective surgery (87%). Most (94%) claims for awake paralysis represented substandard care involving errors in labeling and administration, whereas care was substandard in only 43% of the claims for recall during general anesthesia (P < 0.001). Claims for recall during general anesthesia were more likely to involve women (odds ratio [OR] = 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.58, 6.06) and anesthetic techniques using intraoperative opioids (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.20, 3.74), intraoperative muscle relaxants (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.22, 4.25), and no volatile anesthetic (OR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.88, 5.46).ConclusionsDeficiencies in labeling and vigilance were common causes for awake paralysis. Claims for recall during general anesthesia were more likely in women and with nitrousnarcotic‐relaxant techniques.

 

点击下载:  PDF (7201KB)



返 回