It has been widely believed for several decades that hatchling sea turtles imprint to chemical cues characteristic of their natal beach and use this information as part of a repertoire of mechanisms enabling their return to the same beach for mating and nesting. This has proven very difficult to test. Although the imprinting theory is conceptually simple, functionally it is quite complex. This involves not only chemical imprinting of nestlings but growth and migration to habitats where the adults are found, long-term memory of their earlier chemical exposure, reproductive maturation, and homing. A few studies have been conducted to examine these elements of the imprinting theory. Experiments involving the exposure of embryos and hatchlings to chemicals suggest that juvenile turtles ''imprint'' to the chemical environment of their nest. This can be termed chemical imprinting. Loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta, and ridley turtles, Lepidochelys kempi, appear to be attracted to chemicals (morpholine and natural seawater, respectively) to which they were exposed as embryos. The strongest support for chemical imprinting is that six-month-old green turtles, Chelonia mydas, exposed to either morpholine or 2-phenyIethanol in the nest and for a period of time after hatching, respond similarly to the chemical to which they were exposed as nestlings. Although chemical imprinting does not ''prove'' the imprinting theory of turtle homing, it is a necessary component of the theory not previously examined.