首页   按字顺浏览 期刊浏览 卷期浏览 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TWO‐ABUTMENT HADER BAR DESIGNS
FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TWO‐ABUTMENT HADER BAR DESIGNS

 

作者: M.,   Bidez S.,   McLoughlin Y.,   Chen C.,  

 

期刊: Implant Dentistry  (OVID Available online 1993)
卷期: Volume 2, issue 2  

页码: 107-116

 

ISSN:1056-6163

 

年代: 1993

 

出版商: OVID

 

数据来源: OVID

 

摘要:

Parametric three-dimensional finite element studies were conducted on the Hader bar to determine mechanical properties with respect to bar length, stiffener height, and material properties. Three bar lengths (6, 12, and 18 mm) were analyzed with a 1-mm stiffener height. For the longest bar length (18 mm), two additional stiffener heights were evaluated (2 and 3 mm). In addition, three material types were studied for each of the design cases which represented a selection of alloys commonly used clinically. The model consisted of a representative Hader bar which was constructed of a bar of 1.8 mm diameter. The ends of the bar were fixed to a 2.5-mm diameter coping which was attached to a 1.8-mm diameter root form-type implant, rigidly fixed in a representative block of bone. The bone was modeled as fixed at its distal end to eliminate rigid body motion. A 200-Newton occlusal force was modeled as being transmitted through one, two, or three attachment clips, 5 mm in length, for the three respective bar lengths. The results of these analyses did not predict yielding (failure) for any of the cases studied. Span length and stiffener height were found to play a stronger role in the adequacy of the overall design as compared with changing material properties in the range of alloy stiffness tested. For the span length studies, factors of safety, with respect to static yield strength, ranged from 2.93 to 10.3 arid fatigue factors of safety ranged from 1.41 to 3.36. Parametric evaluations of the effect of stiffener height on failure potential resulted in static yield strength factors of safety ranging from 2.91 to 10.9. Fatigue and shear factors of safety for this series ranged from 1.65 to 5.47 and 2.29 to 10.5, respectively. A factor of safety of five or greater is suggested for Hader bar design. Caution is therefore indicated in the use of several of the systems, particularly under aggressive dynamic and/or high-magnitude (ie, > 200 Newtons) loading conditions if smaller diameter bars are used. (Implant Dent 1993;2:107–114)

 

点击下载:  PDF (617KB)



返 回